Category Archives: Politics

Palin for Prez!

by Mandi

Greatest. Slogan. Ever.

(via)


Texas Textbooks are Changing History

by Mandi

This is pretty much a load of crap. It seems that every 10 years, textbook standards in Texas are re-visited. And because Texas is such a large buyer of textbooks, decisions made in Texas can affect what is taught nationwide.

What’s happened this year is that Republicans are jumping at their chance to assert their political ideals – disguised as “balance.”

I have to agree with what Rep. Mike Villareal (San Antonio, D) said:

I am disturbed that a majority of the board decided their own political agendas were more important than the education of Texas children.

And what Board Member Mary Helen Berlanga had to say:

“They are going overboard, they are not experts, they are not historians,” she said. “They are rewriting history, not only of Texas but of the United States and the world.”

It seems pretty clear, based on statements made by David Bradley, that the focus of the vote was political, not educational.

But Republican board member David Bradley said the curriculum revision process has always been political but the ruling faction had changed since the last time social studies standards were adopted.

“We took our licks, we got outvoted,” he said referring to the debate 10 years earlier. “Now it’s 10-5 in the other direction … we’re an elected body, this is a political process. Outside that, go find yourself a benevolent dictator.”

I really don’t understand this need to be on top politically at the expense of a child’s education.

Some of the changes include:

Texas schoolchildren will be required to learn that the words “separation of church and state” aren’t in the Constitution and evaluate whether the United Nations undermines U.S. sovereignty under new social studies curriculum.

In final votes late Friday, conservatives on the State Board of Education strengthened requirements on teaching the Judeo-Christian influences of the nation’s Founding Fathers and required that the U.S. government be referred to as a “constitutional republic” rather than “democratic.”

I’m amused that some of the most ignorant things (I might as well go ahead and say it… stupid things) I’ve heard said in my lifetime are coming out of this controversy.

“I reject the notion by the left of a constitutional separation of church and state,” said David Bradley, a conservative from Beaumont who works in real estate. “I have $1,000 for the charity of your choice if you can find it in the Constitution.”

Try reading the first amendment and its clauses. Or better yet, listen to what your peers have to say:

Mavis B. Knight, a Democrat from Dallas, introduced an amendment requiring that students study the reasons “the founding fathers protected religious freedom in America by barring the government from promoting or disfavoring any particular religion above all others.”

It was defeated on a party-line vote.

Am I the only one who sees the irony there? Ms. Knight, following the lead of the conservative members of the Board, removed the words “separation of church and state” from her amendment and was still defeated.

I’m flabbergasted!

Cynthia Dunbar, a lawyer from Richmond who is a strict constitutionalist and thinks the nation was founded on Christian beliefs, managed to cut Thomas Jefferson from a list of figures whose writings inspired revolutions in the late 18th century and 19th century, replacing him with St. Thomas Aquinas, John Calvin and William Blackstone. (Jefferson is not well liked among conservatives on the board because he coined the term “separation between church and state.”)

This just keeps getting better and better, doesn’t it? It’s like a trainwreck and you can’t look away.

What is happening in this country? First Arizona, now Texas. What’s next?


Sell the Vatican

by Mandi

I’m kind of digging Sarah Silverman’s new thing…


Crazy Man in a Robe Say What?

by Mandi

**UPDATE** This guy said it better than I did with a single image.

I didn’t really think any headline could surprise me anymore. We do some crazy stuff in this country. Then I saw this.

Interracial couple denied marriage license

Why does everything always have to be about race in the South? Seriously.

Everything.

Even my 17 year old cousin makes a racial distinction when she talks about people. It’s not “that guy” or “that girl” it’s that “black guy” or “black girl.” If there’s no qualifier, it’s generally assumed that the person in question is white.

It’s serious culture shock after having lived in Denver for so long. Race is pretty much a non-issue there. People are just people. There aren’t black people and white people and brown people. There are people. Who happen to be black or white or brown.

So then I see this headline. Which speaks of the greatest sin of all.* Interracial marriage. God forbid this justice of the peace actually do his job.

A Louisiana justice of the peace said he refused to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple out of concern for any children the couple might have.

I’m sorry, since when is that his job? To assume that an interracial marriage won’t last and the children will be harmed somehow is completely and totally baffling to me.

Are we really trying to redefine marriage from “two people” to “one man and one woman” to “one man and one woman of the same race”?

Really?

I hope the ACLU succeeds in getting this guy in trouble.

On a side note, I found this quote to be particularly funny, given how it’s completely been thrown out of the window:

“It is really astonishing and disappointing to see this come up in 2009,” said American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana attorney Katie Schwartzman. “The Supreme Court ruled as far back as 1963 that the government cannot tell people who they can and cannot marry.”

I do have to wonder why the ACLU thinks the government is going to pay attention to that when clearly they take pride in telling gay people who they can and can’t marry.

*Funny story about interracial relationships. I told my stepdad that there had been a guy I was interested in from a few months back. The next morning at 8am he calls me to wake me up and goes, “I only have one question. The guy you mentioned last night… he’s not black is he?” Yes folks, I mentioned a crush in passing and I get a frantic call the next morning. Isn’t life in the South grand sometimes?


It’s a Love Story

by Mandi

I really think I need to see Michael Moore’s new movie.


Healthcare

by Mandi

I started reading Helen’s thoughts on the world awhile ago. She doesn’t post often, but when she does it’s always carefully thought out and very insightful. And I haven’t disagreed with her yet. Today, she posted her thoughts about the healthcare debate. I urge you to read it yourself, but here are a few of my favorite parts.

Exactly how expensive does healthcare have to get before we decide to have an honest, meaningful conversation about this?   Rush is out there talking about how this will keep you from getting your next raise.  I’ve got news for you Rush.  Maybe not for you, but for the rest of the world it already has.  Sixty-two percent of all bankruptcies filed in 2007 were linked to medical expenses and almost all of those individuals had health insurance. About 1.5 million families lose their homes to foreclosure every year due to unaffordable medical costs.  Over the last few years, health insurance costs for small businesses have increased by over 100%.

What does it say about our country if the biggest debate of the decade is no longer about the two wars we are fighting but rather about preventing children and families from having access to affordable healthcare?  I’ll tell you what it says to me.  It says the Christian Right never really was and Value Voters aren’t very valuable.

Universal Healthcare in the wealthiest country on earth should have been a no brainer.  And speaking of a no brainer…

Michele Bachman thinks healthcare reform is unconstitutional.   I think Michelle Bachmann is as nutty as a fruit cake.  Or as we say down here in Texas – Michele is one taco short of a combo plate.  She is a few fries short of a happy meal.  Her elevator doesn’t go all the way to the top floor.   Her cord is too short to reach the outlet.  The wheel might be spinning but the hamster is dead. 

That woman just isn’t right in the head.   I mean it. Really.

Yeah. What she said.


I Set the Rules

by Mandi

Oops? All I can say… he deserves this to be on youtube.


Pastor Prayed for Obama to Die

by Mandi

“To be honest with you, I have prayed for Obama to die. I’m not the only one, I’m just the only one with the spine to say it.”

Yes, a pastor said this. Even when I identified myself as a person of faith, this kind of behavior would have absolutely shocked me. And not only did Pastor Steven Anderson admit to praying this, but he knew in advance that someone was going to bring a gun to an Obama event.

From Talking Points Memo:

Chris Broughton, the man who brought an assault rifle and a handgun to the Obama event in Arizona last week, attended a fiery anti-Obama sermon the day before the event, in which Pastor Steven Anderson said he was going to “pray for Barack Obama to die and go to hell”, Anderson confirmed to TPMmuckraker today.

Anderson also said Broughton had informed the pastor about his planned show of arms-bearing, but “he planned out the AR15 thing long before he heard that sermon,” delivered Sunday August 16 at the fundamentalist Faithful Word Baptist Church in Tempe, AZ.

I really hope a story shows up soon about how this guy’s congregation asked him to step down from church leadership.

As for what he said: I believe that people have the right to say what they want. Even if it’s something as heinous as this. HOWEVER… I believe Christians, and especially pastors, have put themselves in a place to be held to a higher standard. One where this kind of behavior is simply unacceptable.


Public Plan Explained

by Mandi

This is a really good explanation for health care reform.

 

HT: Daily Kos


Marital Rape

by Mandi

The Bahamian Government is planning to outlaw marital rape.

The present law in the Bahamas defines rape as an act of any person not under 14 years of age having sex with another person who is not his spouse without the consent of that other person; without consent that had been extorted by threats or fear of bodily harm; with consent obtained by impersonating the spouse of the other person; or with consent obtained by false and fraudulent representations as to the nature and quality of the act. 

The proposed amendment would omit the words “who is not his spouse” in essence making it illegal for any person to have sex with another without consent – regardless if they are married or not. 

Under the current law, rape can only occur in a marriage if the couple is legally separated.

Marital rape was outlawed in the United States in 1976. The penalty for raping your spouse is typically more leniant than for raping a stranger, but it is still considered rape.

The issue has sparked a national debate in the Bahamas, which baffles me. It turns out that there are actually people out there who believe that you can’t rape your spouse. In both of the articles I linked above, the opposing opinions quoted are all from people of faith, and they use their faith to justify this belief (bold emphasis mine).

Controversial pastor Cedric Moss has vocally opposed the legislation claiming the amendment would create a “society of rapists.” Citing the “word of God”, Mr Moss argued that rape cannot be committed in marriage because the couple, gave each other authority over the other’s body and agreed to open-ended sexual consent in the marriage contract.

“It is ridiculous for them to try to make that a law, because I don’t think a man can rape his own wife. After two people get married, the Bible says that they become one – one flesh. How is it possible to rape what is yours?” asked Mr. Sutherland.

Elvis Russell told the Journal that he does not support the bill either because there is no such thing as rape within a marriage.

Even if a woman says no to her husband it still can’t be considered rape because she is his wife. He already paid his dues at the church and she already said ‘I do,’ so from then on, even if [a man] forces sex on his wife, it isn’t rape,” he said.

Deanne Sweeting said that she strongly disagrees with the bill and does not understand why so many women are supporting it.

“I disagree with the bill because I disagree that a man can rape his wife. The Bible tells me that a man’s body is his wife’s and her body is his. How could he rape her?” asked Ms. Sweeting.

Coralee Clarke told the Journal that although she is not married, she believes that a man is entitled to sex from his wife whenever he feels like it.

“If a man wants to have sex with his wife he is supposed to [have sex with her] regardless of what the circumstances [are]. I don’t see why he should be charged with raping his own wife, she is never supposed to say no,” said Ms. Clarke.

“If I were married and my husband wanted to have sex with me I wouldn’t stop him, [because] I’m not supposed to, even if I was tired or feeling sick, I wouldn’t tell him no.”

This makes me sick. These people are so blinded by their faith that they can’t tell right from wrong. And that is not a sentence I thought I’d ever type. One of the reasons I feel so strongly about this issue, other than being a woman who expects my no to mean no, is that I have a friend who has seen this happen. His best friend is married to an abusive man. She is on some sort of medication that pretty much makes her pass out at night, and it turns out that her husband has his way with her while she’s passed out. And he’s bragged about this to his friends.

And that makes me sick to my stomach.

Sex is supposed to an incredible thing. It’s supposed to enjoyed. It’s supposed to be consentual. It’s supposed to be mutual. Married or not married, any sex that is forced, is now, has always been, and will always be rape. And rape is illegal.

But this isn’t just about rape. It’s about how men (and society) treat women. The fact that there are people who say that a man cannot rape his wife because, even if he forces her to have sex, he owns her shows that there is a giant problem with women’s rights. I do understand that these opinions that have been expressed didn’t come from American culture. But they did come from a Christian culture. And I don’t see it at all as a far leap from Christians in the Bahamas reacting this way to Christians in America reacting this way.

Because I’ve been told by a pastor that a woman should never deny her husband sex. And it’s exactly that kind of attitude that leads to marital rape. It makes me wonder how many wives are raped by their husbands every day, but they never tell anyone because they’ve been told it’s their duty as good Christian wives to never deny their husbands. How many women out there have never experienced the joy of sex because all they’ve ever known is marital rape?

Melodramatic? Maybe. But I think it exists more than anyone thinks  in more conservative and fundamental communities.

So back to the law. It’s a good law. But the only way it’ll be a great law (in any country, including the US), is if women are educated about marital rape and taught that it’s okay to say no,  it’s never okay for your husband to force you, and if he does it’s okay to tell somebody.


Scrappy Theme by Caroline Moore | Copyright 2012 Simply Mandi Kaye | Powered by WordPress