Category Archives: News

More on the veto

by Mandi

It’s amazing what some folks are saying about this veto. Many are comparing this to the war in Iraq. Some are asking how the President can allow the deaths of men, women, and children in Iraq, as well as the deaths of adult American citizens in Iraq, yet he won’t allow embryos to be used that would be discarded anyway. They call him a hypocrite.

These folks have missed the boat.

Nowhere has President Bush banned human embryonic stem cell research. There is no ban. There has never been a ban. President Bush has simply refused to allow our tax dollars to pay for this research. Research that has not been shown viable in the first place.

MKH pointed to a post by Captain Ed that explains:

Undoubtedly, we will hear plenty from critics that Bush has endangered the health of Americans through his veto, a conclusion bordering on the absurd. Putting aside the fact that we shouldn’t grind up humans to save other humans, this veto doesn’t ban any kind of research at all. It just makes human embryonic stem-cell (hESC) research ineligible for federal funding. It’s not a ban, and in fact that research has never been banned within the US.

The lack of federal funding should make little difference, if the science is sound for hESC. It’s not, or at least it isn’t commercially viable, which is why researchers want the federal government to pay for it. Pharmaceuticals won’t underwrite it because adult stem cells and umbilical-cord stem cells have had much more success. They have produced actual medical treatments, where hESCs have had little real success. California planned on spending $2 billion on ESC, and we have yet to hear of any breakthroughs from that research.

I also want to share with you Captain Ed’s scientific reason for believe that human life begins at conception:

I believe that life begins within minutes of conception, and that belief is based on science, not faith, although they intersect. Eggs and sperm carry 23 chromosomes, half of the genetic blueprint for human life. Even if other primates have the same chromosome count, the DNA encoding on human eggs and sperm is uniquely human. When the sperm fertilizes the egg, the separate DNA strands combine into 23 pairs of chromosomes and a unique blueprint for a unique human being. Once the cell divides on its own — usually within a half-hour — that being is alive, unique, and separate from, though dependent on, its mother.

Some have argued this point for decades. Phil Donahue, years ago, once said on television that a human being in the womb passes through stages where it becomes a fish, then a dog, and so on; this argument arises amongst the ignorant often. Science teaches us that this is folk-tale nonsense. Vertebrates in the womb all pass through similar stages of development, but we are encoded at conception as human, and human we remain from the moment of conception until our death. Our DNA and genetic composition is a fact, not a belief, and cell division demonstrates life, as any biologist will tell you. Facts. Not beliefs.

It’s silly that this veto is being used to portray Bush as a man who wants to set back research. That isn’t the case at all. If he wanted to do that he would attempt to ban stem-cell research. But again, the research has not been banned. Vetoing this bill did not ban stem-cell research. It simply refused to allow American tax dollars to fund it. And I have to agree with Captain Ed. If this research is so groundbreaking, then why aren’t private sources funding it?

Blogs who link here: Pursuing Holiness, Conservative Cat, Dumb Ox News

Tags: , ,


More on HPV

by Mandi

There’s a great article on Pursuing Holiness that directs your attention to two articles over on PoliPundit. They make the assertion that if the government will require all school aged females to receive the HPV vaccine, then it should also require all males to be circumcised because it has been proven that circumcision greatly reduces the risk of HIV.

Laura writes:

Oak Leaf at Polipundit is also pro-choice on this issue. In response to some commenters who argued along these lines-

“The policy of not admitting children without vaccines is not only aimed at preventing infection in elementary school, but its goal is also to create a society full of immune individuals, since so many people go to public schools.

Making it mandatory for admittance into schools is a convenient way of making sure that this disease dies out quickly.”

he then upped the ante by pointing out that circumcision can reduce the risk for HIV, so should we now enforce circumcision for all boys?

Interesting idea. If making it mandatory for girls to be vaccinated against an STD is logical, mandatory circumcision is equally logical. But it doesn’t go far enough.

Boys are far more at risk for HIV, and the vast majority of HIV infections are due to sex. 73% of all HIV diagnoses in 2004 were for males. Of all 2004 HIV diagnoses, 81% of male, and 78% of female HIV infection are due to sex.

Consequently I suggest that the solution is to put a stop to all teenage sex. And in keeping with the idea that girls who wish to attend school should receive a mandatory STD vaccination, I think that it’s only sensible to require all boys to undergo chemical castration if they want to attend school.

I’m sure, presented with these facts about HIV transmission, that the people who demand mandatory HPV vaccination will agree with me. After all, who doesn’t want to protect children from HIV/AIDS?

Tags: , , ,


HPV Vaccine

by Mandi

I came across an article at AlterNet today called Why the Religious Right Fights Cancer Prevention (HT: Martian). The first paragraph reads:

The Food and Drug Administration advisory panel approved a vaccine for the human papilloma virus (HPV) last week. The vaccine appears to be 100 percent effective at protecting against the most prevalent viruses that cause cervical cancer. While public health professionals view the vaccine as miraculous, many conservative organizations oppose it on the grounds that it might encourage promiscuity among adolescent girls. Now that the FDA has approved the vaccine, conservatives are already working feverishly to limit or even prevent its use.

I encourage you to read the entire article before you read my comments on the article. After reading it, I posted the following comment on Martian’s blog:

I am what most of you would call a…what was it ManWithoutAParty called us? A “religious right whacko.” However, I think the HPV vaccine is a wonderful thing. On Monday I found out that a good friend of mine has HPV and has to have part of her cervix removed because it is pre- cancerous. She could still get cancer, and she may never be able to have children. When she marries, her husband will be able to take the vaccine and they will be able to enjoy the many pleasures of marriage. For that reason alone, I support the vaccine.

My concerns lie in the sources of the article. AlterNet itself is pretty liberally biased. It’s main source, Feministing.com, is most definitely liberally biased. Both are against conservative opinions on principle. From reading the article carefully, and noticing how words are spun, it seems to me that those who have been vocal aren’t against the vaccine itself–they realize it’s a good thing. They’re against making it mandatory. The article even quoted Focus on the Family, one of those “religious right whacko” organizations, as saying that it “supports widespread (universal) availability of HPV vaccines but opposes mandatory HPV vaccinations for entry to public school.”

The basic reasoning behind that being that by universally requiring this vaccine is akin to giving a 13 year old girl a license to go out and have sex with whoever she wants to because there’s no risk of disease (granted, that isn’t true because HPV is only one of any number of STDs). The fear is that as we come up with these amazing medical advances that take away the fear of having sex with people you don’t know, our society will crumble. How many of you want your 12 or 13 year old daughters having sex? Teenage pregnancy rates will skyrocket. Too many people will rely on welfare. Maybe I’m being slightly melodramatic, but everything has consequences. Nothing good can come out of giving teenagers a reason not to abstain.

But, I want to repeat this, just so no one here can try to twist my words. I am a Christian. I am conservative. And I support the HPV vaccine.

Yes, those words are true. What really upsets me about articles like this is that they pass off biased opinions as fact. AlterNet and Feministing both have agendas. Both are liberal and anti-religious. And somehow, these are the writers and sources for a story that is anti-conservative. Go figure.

Now here’s the rub. If you take what has been said from conservative leaders in context then you will see that this story has completely spun them. No one is against the vaccine. What we are against is the mandatory universal vaccination of children for an STD.

We believe in teaching our children abstinence.
We believe in teaching our children that actions have consequences.
We believe in teaching our children that sex before marriage is wrong.
We believe in teaching our children that promiscuity is wrong.
But above all
We believe in teaching our children love, forgiveness, and grace.

The bottom line is that we believe parents ought to teach their children about life and how to live it. Vaccinations like these, if made mandatory, would  make it all too easy to forget that.

Tags: , , , , ,


I, too, do not celebrate the death of al-Zarqawi

by Mandi

I want to direct you to two posts by two of my favorite bloggers.

First, I don’t celebrate the death of al-Zarqawi, by Laura over at Pursuing Holiness

She writes:

We’ve killed someone who would gladly have killed us all. Lives were saved by this action. Justice was served. And yet I’m still not rejoicing because Jesus died for him too. And for all the other jihadis would would gladly kill us. The choice is to fight evil or be overcome by it. I believe we’re doing the right thing. C.S. Lewis’ essay, Why I Am Not A Pacifist in The Weight of Glory is an excellent explanation of why a Christian must support just wars. But while we support the war, the troops, our country, and our civilization, we need to remember to pray for the lost. That includes those who have vowed to kill us.

Then, Randy Thomas from Everyday Thoughts Collected, writes in Al Zarqawi is dead:

I will just say that I have zero joy in his death but I am glad that he is no longer a threat to innocent lives. He deserves justice but just as the Lord does not delight in the death of the wicked… neither should I.

He follows up in a comment:

And I honestly hope that, somehow, al-Zarqawi and those who perished with him had the name of Jesus on their lips before they died. They earned the consequences of their actions, but I honestly hope some or all of them repented.

And I wholeheartedly agree with both of them. We need more Christians openly showing this kind of mercy, grace, and compassion. A man is dead. What is there to rejoice in? Especially a man who, more than likely, is spending eternity in hell. I find no peace or comfort in that.

Tags: , ,


Scrappy Theme by Caroline Moore | Copyright 2012 Simply Mandi Kaye | Powered by WordPress