Category Archives: Books

Twilight: The Movie

Well after all the hype… Twilight was a hit and miss movie. With far far far more misses than hits. I’m still glad I saw it, I’ll probably still buy the DVD… but honestly, it’s only because of my Twilight obsession. Nothing to do with the quality of the movie.

Let’s start with the casting. I have to say, I was pleasantly surprised. Ever since the cast was announced, I’ve thought it was all wrong. The posters and pictures I saw just weren’t right. They were pretty actors and actresses, but they weren’t my crew from Forks. But seeing them in costume and makeup I’d have to say that they nailed it, for the most part. I still think Charlie was wrong. And Mike. And Angela. And definitely Eric and Tyler. They managed to pull it off, but it was somewhat off. There was only one that absolutely no way no how did not work for me. Jasper. Jasper was all wrong. Creepy wrong. But the one I thought was the most wrong before I saw the movie turned out to be very very right. Jacob. My oh my, Jacob. Hello my Jacob.

Alice, Rosalie, and Emmett were absolutely dead on. No one else was cast as well as these three. Carlisle didn’t completely work for me, simply because he was too rugged. Plus Peter Facinelli just doesn’t look good blonde.  Bella and Edward were… meh. They grew on me. But it still didn’t really work.

The biggest downfall of the movie was that there was no character development. The best and most famous line of the book was when Edward tells Bella that she is his brand of heroin. In the book, he didn’t have to say that. We already knew. You could feel the heat between the two of them jump off the pages. In the movie, he had to say it because if he didn’t, you wouldn’t have known. There was absolutely no chemistry between them on screen. Which is why I think this movie was a complete failure. There would be no story without Bella and Edward’s love. But that love was not visible on screen. The lines were delivered, but that was all.

There were, however, a few good points. But a scant few. In fact, I’m having trouble remembering what they are. The fight between Edward and James was well played. The baseball game was good. There was a teensy bit of chemistry between Bella and Edward when they were in the tree that made me smile.

Few other nitpicks… the Cullens’ house was all wrong. The prom was wrong. Tyler was supposed to think he was taking Bella to the prom. The way Bella discovered what Edward is was wrong.

Okay I’ll stop tearing it apart now. Bottom line, it fell way short of the mark for me. But it’s a part of the Twilight canon, so I’ll still be buying the DVD.

It’s Almost Here!

I seriously can’t wait…

Breaking Dawn

Last summer I discovered the brilliance of Stephenie Meyer.

On Saturday, the saga was complete. After waiting a year for Breaking Dawn to arrive, I finished it in two days. It would have taken less time, but I was actually busy on Saturday… shocking, I know!

When I started the book, I was wary. The preface left me thinking the worst, and then I was shocked at the turn of events that took place (I managed to stay completely spoiler free for this one!). But in the end, it was fantastic. I laughed, I cried, I cried some more…

And while I’m sad the series is complete, I’m thrilled with the way it ended. There was a sense of finality. Closure. It wasn’t open ended in the slightest. Loose ends were tied up. And that’s how a series should end. When it’s over, it should be over.

Kudos to Stephenie for this amazing series. Now I can’t wait for Midnight Sun – the first book of the series written from a different character’s perspective!

Sexuality

For many, sexuality is simply what happens between two people involving physical pleasure. But that’s only a small percentage of what sexuality is. Our sexuality is all of the ways we strive to reconnect with our world, with each other, and with God.

~Rob Bell, Sex God

This is a profoundly true statement that goes against everything that American culture embodies. I love the way Rob describes a celibate man as sexual:

A friend of mine has given his life to standing with those who have been forgotten and oppressed by most. He’s in his early thirties, he’s single, and he talks openly about his celibacy. What makes his life so powerful is that he’s a very sexual person, but he has focused his sexuality, his “energies for connection,” on a specific group of people.

Some of the most sexual people I know are celibate.

They sleep alone.

They have chosen to give themselves to lots of people, to serve and give and connect their lives with beautiful worthy causes.

He goes on to describe the Red Light District of Amsterdam as a place full of sex but devoid of sexuality.

When it’s just sex, then that’s all it is. It leaves the person deeply unconnected.

You can be having sex with many, and yet you’re alone. And the more sex you have, the more alone you are.

And it’s possible to be sleeping alone, and celibate, and to be very sexual. Connected with many.

I need to take this opportunity to explain that this isn’t just another instance of a Christian saying sex is bad (speaking of, did anybody catch the “No Sex Allowed” song on AI last night? wow). That’s not the point at all. And nowhere is anyone saying that sex is bad.

Rob’s idea is that a person’s sexuality is the connection that people have with people. The connection that people crave with other people. It’s not just physical intimacy.

It’s a radical idea. But after reading Sex God (again) I have to agree with him.

What does “evangelical”mean?

The greek word evangelion, from which we derive our words evangelical and evangelism, is an ancient word that predates Jesus. It is a word Jesus taks from the imperial lexicon and turns on its head. For instance, in 6 BC there was a saying inscribed around the Roman Empire: “Augustus has been sent to us as Savior…the birthday of the god Augustus has been for the whole world the beginning of the gospel [evangelion].” The early evangelists announced another gospel, proclaimed an allegiance to another emperor, and conspired to build another kingdom. If by evangelical we mean one who spreads the good news that there is another kingdom or superpower, an economy and a peace other than that of the nations, a savior other than Caesar, then yes, I am an evangelical.

These words were written by Shane Claiborne in The Irresistable Revolution: Living as an Ordinary Radical.

I want to be an evangelical. But my heart remains cold and cynical towards matters of faith.

Blue Like Jazz – the movie?

This is pretty incredibly cool. I can’t wait to see what it’ll look like!

His Dark Materials

I was able to read the final two books in Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials trilogy while I was gone.

I have to say, Pullman is a mighty fine author.

Both The Subtle Knife and The Amber Spyglass were page turners. And, after having read the entire trilogy, I have to conclude that the fundies are, to put it bluntly, full of crap.

There was one passage in the final book that was blatantly anti-Christianity, but I really didn’t find the rest of it to be. Anti-organized religion, maybe. Anti-sheepism*, definitely. This is the only passage that I found to be questionable:

I used to be a nun, you see. I thought physics could be done to the glory of God, till I saw there wasn’t any God at all and that physics was more interesting anyway. The Christian religion is a very powerful and convincing mistake, that’s all.

[...]

I thought, Will anyone be better off if I go straight back to the hotel and say my prayers and confess to the priest and promise never to fall into temptation again? Will anyone be the better for making me miserable?

And the answer came back – no. No one will. There’s no one to fret, no one to condemn, no one to bless me for being a good girl, no one to punish me for being wicked. Heaven was empty. I didn’t know whether God had died, or whether there had never been a God at all. Either way I felt free and lonely and I didn’t know whether I was happy or unhappy, but something very strange had happened.

In retrospect, that passage probably doesn’t make much sense out of context. The woman speaking was a former nun and she was telling the story of how she stopped being a nun. She had an experience that made her question the choices she had made, and in the end, she chose to leave the Church and follow her passion.

Out of three books, that was the only passage that I thought was truly anti-Christian. And killing God? Hardly! If you plan to read the books, then I apologize for this spoiler (although it doesn’t detract from the plot at all): God is not killed in this book. In fact, God is never seen in these books. Mentioned, yes. The character that “is killed” (um, he dies but isn’t “killed”) is known as “The Authority”, but it’s made clear through the books that he is not the Creator, only a created being who decided he wanted to be in charge.

I don’t see what all the hullaballoo is about surrounding these books. Honestly, I don’t. Pullman is a great writer. His story is classic.

Do me a favor? Read the books before you make judgement on them. Don’t spout off about how horrible they are if you haven’t read it yet. At least take the time to know what you’re talking about before you start spouting nonsense.

 Off soapbox now.

*Yes, I made this word up. It means being a sheep by not thinking for yourself and just following where people lead you.

Star Trek, The Golden Compass, and Blasphemy

Pretty much, yeah.

The Golden Compass

From the moment I saw the trailer for The Golden Compass, I’ve wanted to see it. But then I heard these rumors going around that it was really atheist propaganda. According to Snopes, it’s true:

The series’ author, Phillip Pullman, is an avowed atheist who has averred that “I don’t profess any religion; I don’t think it’s possible that there is a God; I have the greatest difficulty in understanding what is meant by the words ‘spiritual’ or ‘spirituality.’” Critics of Pullman’s books point to the strong anti-religion and anti-God themes they incorporate, and although literary works are subject to a variety of interpretations, Pullman left little doubt about his intentions when he said in a 2003 interview with The Sydney Morning Herald that “My books are about killing God.” (Conservative British  columnish Peter Hitchens  labeled Pullman “The Most Dangerous Author in Britain” and described him as the writer  “the atheists would have been praying for, if atheists prayed.”)

So I decided I’d go buy the book and read it first. And after reading the book, I still want to see the movie.

This first book is supposedly the the least offensive of the three books, so I’m definitely curious to read the last two. There were some anti-religion themes in the book, that’s for sure. The bad guys are in league with the Church because of their perception that something is bad, when in fact, it probably isn’t. After reading the book, my first thought is that it’s more anti-Catholic than anything else. (Side note: why is it that media always depicts religion as Catholic?) That opinion may change after reading the rest of the trilogy.

From the previews of the movie, though, I have to wonder just how true the movie is to the book. It’s being billed as a kid’s movie, but I bought the book from the adult sci-fi section of B&N (although they were selling a box set of the trilogy in the YA section, the individual books themselves weren’t shelved there). There are definitely some adult themes in the book, and I really want to see how they’re portrayed in the movie – or if they’re just left out entirely in an effort to entice the kids to read the books.

I guess I’ll find out later this month when it comes out.

Letters from a Skeptic: The Bible (Part 2)

So even though these posts are somewhat getting picked apart (in a polite way), I’m going to continue. The focus of this blog since early summer has been my journey away from faith and back to it again, so I want to stay true to what this blog is all about.

Yesterday’s post began to tackle the reliability of the Bible, and despite numerous complaints from commenters, I’m sold. This book, Letters from a Skeptic, is showing me how to view Christianity and the Bible from a lens other than fundamentalism, and that’s something I’ve desperately been searching for. It’s really helping me to rebuild a foundation with solid footing.

 So today I want to look at the reliability of the Bible a little more and discuss how it should relate to faith.

Continue reading