Monthly Archives: April 2007

I’m in pain, but it’s a happy day!

I have my own apartment! I’m thrilled! Nearly all of my stuff has been moved. There’s one load left in the truck downstairs, but we just couldn’t unload it last night.

We had an adventure, though. While we were driving the second load over, one by one all of the lugnuts on the rear driver’s tire fell off. THEN THE TIRE FELL OFF. While we were driving. Luckily we were pulling into a gas station when it happened. We’ve decided yesterday was “The Day the Truck Went SPLAT!” It was funny. Made funnier by the fact that we were slap-happy because it was nearly 10pm. At first we were freaked out because the truck had just had a broken axle fixed and we were worried that it had broken again. But then we realized that there were no lugnuts in sight. Tasha and I walked about a mile or so to find all of them, and then her dad put them back on and we didn’t have any more problems.

But that took a nice chunk of time out of our moving schedule. That’s why we didn’t finish last night like we planned.

And today I feel like I’ve been run over by a semi. But I’m in my own apartment! Yay!

Mandi on Pets

My roommates and I fundamentally disagree on the function pets serve in a family. Enough so, that the last time we fought over the issue, I decided that I had to move out if our friendship was to survive (which I’m doing tonight….yay!). I knew I couldn’t take our (my) dog with me, so my plan was to list DJ on craig’s list and find him a good home. My roommates decided they wanted to keep him. So he is now their dog. My baby is their dog.

They will make him an almost exclusively outdoor dog. He will only be allowed inside at night when it’s “really cold.” To me, this means they’re putting him outside and will neglect him. They’ll see him/play with him when it’s convenient for them. The rest of the time, he’ll be outside. Alone. And this dog doesn’t do well with alone. He’s got a mild form of separation anxiety. And so far, I’ve been the only one to work on it with him.

To me, dogs are family, not toys. For better of worse, when you sign on for the responsibility of a pet, that pet becomes a member of the family. You have to take care of the dog. You have to play with the dog. You can’t throw it in the backyard and leave it there for several days until you decide you have a few spare moments to pet the dog. That’s a quick way to kill a dog’s spirit, and possibly make him aggressive.

I’m worried about DJ and what will happen to him. I have no say anymore, and I recognize that. I left my apartment in tears this morning (though my roommates don’t know that…well, they do now since they read this) because of the conversation they were having about DJ and how he will be outside all the time. I didn’t say anything to them out of respect for them because he is their dog now. And the last time we talked about these differences of opinion it ended up in a fight. But it breaks my heart to know he’s going to be alone. If I could take him, I would. But I can’t.

So he’s going from my baby to their toy. I hope he handles the transition better than I think he will.

dj-5-mos.JPG

Harry Potter Trailer

I can’t wait to see the movie!

Religion is Good for Kids

A new study says that kids with religious parents are better behaved and more adjusted than other children.

Coke and Your Body

I’m still drinking Coke (at this moment, actually).

The Certainty of God’s Truth

This is good:

Once we, as humans, begin to tamper with what God says is true and good, we launch ourselves down a slippery slope that will necessarily lead to greater and grander error. Only when we have rejected God’s truth do we need to fight about and wrestle with issues such as whether a baby killed inside its mother is morally and ethically equal to the murder of a baby outside of its mother’s body. Only when we turn from God’s truth do we need to wonder if a man who used to be a woman is really now a woman or a man. When God’s Word is held out as the standard, these questions immediately dissolve in the light of its certainty.

Read the whole article for some pretty extreme examples.

Protected: Nancy Pelosi and Abortion

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


What’s the deal with H.R. 1592?

This is absolutely ridiculous.

poster202.jpg

It’s disgusting. Over the top. And it’s the evangelical response to the bill coming before the Senate to enforce severe punishment for “hate crimes.”

Except… the bill doesn’t really enforce punishment for all “hate crimes,” or does it?

From Harry Jackson:

This legislation will grant protected status to “sexual orientation” and “gender identity.” Further, it will mandate unequal protection under the law and will pave the way for the criminalization of thoughts and religious beliefs contrary to “politically correct” ideas.

As an African American, I have long questioned the attempts of the gay community to piggy back on the legislative breakthroughs blacks have achieved in civil rights. As I think about hate crime legislation in the past, I think about a judicial system that refused to give blacks equal justice under the law. The historic problem for blacks was that racist groups conspired with law enforcement groups. Additional legislation would have never been necessary if the existing laws of the land had been enforced fairly.

In contrast, gays already are a formidable force in the legal arena and courts are often extremely deferential to their cases. Additional protection for gays is not necessary. This legislation will not just over-protect them, it will bring the threat of invasive, governmental interference with the doctrines and practice of the Church. We have faced the removal of crosses and commandments from every public facility; this same pressure could be felt within the four walls of the church.

Religious liberty battles have most recently been championed by white evangelical groups. It’s important at this juncture that all Americans lift their voices concerning this legislation. This week I am calling a press conference which will involve some of the nation’s most influential black religious leaders. The proponents of this bill have assumed that black religious leaders will not catch on to the long term implications of the legislation. Without a massive public outcry, this act may be put into force within a few weeks.

My alarm about the hate crimes bill is bigger than my concerns about the gay movement. The question we must ask ourselves is this, “Do we want an America in which no one can express their true religious views”? Isn’t freedom of speech a major value of our nation?

Some gays chant, “Stay out of our bedrooms!” Pro-abortion advocates say, “Keep your hands off my reproductive organs!” Evangelicals can rightfully say, “Stay out of my pulpit!”

My personal thought?

Why is everyone focusing solely on the “homosexual” agenda here? The bill is not primarily targeting hate crimes against homosexuals. It’s specific that the “hate crime” includes “violence motivated by the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of the victim.” That’s more than just homosexuality. Hey look! Religion is listed, too!

There is no grand conspiracy to lock away pastors and Christians for teaching the Bible. People who are taking this as a “surreptitious attempt by the Congress and Senate to strip the nation of religious freedom and the ability to preach the gospel from our church pulpits” are, in my opinion, too concerned for themselves. They see anything that mentions homosexuality (sexual orientation/gender identity) as a threat to them and automatically assume that there’s a conspiracy to end Christianity and have the gays rule the world.

I don’t think I’m overstating it. There’s been a flurry of activity on evangelical sites, all urging America not to support this bill. Why? Because they’re afraid they’re going to lose power.

Well boo hoo. I’m a Christian. An evangelical, even. But I can’t support all of this anti-gay stuff going on in the evangelical community.

Yes, I agree with the biblical teaching that homosexuality is wrong. BUT, I also agree and adhere to the biblical teachings of love. I recognize that God loves ALL people (that includes the GLBT community) and as such, so should I. That concept has been lost by the Christian community at large.

Ray Comfort to Prove God

Ray Comfort is a quack.

It may not be the most Christlike thing for me to say, but the man drives me nuts. I believe his heart and desire for God are absolutely sincere, but have you seen this? How can you take this man seriously after that?

Now he’s going to debate God’s existence with the founders of The Blasphemy Challenge website. (HT: Matt)

I encourage you to read what Matt says about this debate. Here’s a sample:

If God could have been proven, Jesus probably would have done that, and if not Jesus, the disciples or the early church. If God was able to be proven without a doubt, it removes our ability to choose. God wants us to accept His gift of salvation freely, if it was known to be a fact that He was there, we lose our freedom because He is the only option. The Bible never speaks of the necessity of proof, it speaks of the actions and the faith of God’s followers. Now, as suggested in the previous paragraph, I want to make it extremely clear that I don’t think this is a blind faith. There is plenty of reason behind faith, but it is faith none the less. And moreover, the Bible speaks of faith in a positive light and not something that we should be sad about “only” having; I don’t need certitude to be convinced (and any scientist should be completely on board with that because how often is something entirely certain?). Faith and reason are not mutually exclusive.

He also touches on the website previously mentioned, and wonders what the merits of this kind of debate are. In all honesty, I think this is going to end up as one more thing that atheists can use to laugh at theists. It will be entertaining, for sure, but I think it may do more harm than good.

But we’ll see.

Christian Carnival 169

Welcome to the 169th Christian Carnival! There are some great posts this week. 

There were fewer submissions this week than last week, so I’ll keep this week’s Carnival open through Friday. That means that any post written prior to today may be submitted through Friday, April 27.

UPDATE: It turns out there were more submissions than I thought! Someone, somewhere, posted my email address as a gmail address, rather than yahoo. Luckily, I own the gmail address too, though I’ve never used it nor given it out, so the missing entries aren’t lost! My apologies for getting them added on so late.

On to the carnival!


    Trackposted to  Perri Nelson’s Website, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, third world county, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, basil’s blogLeaning Straight Up, The Bullwinkle BlogCORSARI D’ITALIA, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.