Monthly Archives: January 2007

Christian Carnival CLVII

Welcome to this week’s edition of Christian Carnival! This is my first time hosting, and coming up with a theme is killer so I decided to keep it simple.

There is a way that seems right to a man, but in the end it leads to death.
~Proverbs 14:12

This is a verse I’ve been meditating on this week. And each of these posts reflect that it is God’s way that leads to life and not man’s way.

Mark, from Pseudo-Polymath, wonders how we choose our denomination in the cafeteria that God and man have made of His church in Dwelling in Ruins.

Catez, from Allthings2All, believes that words like “justification,” “sanctification,” “repentance,” and “flesh” are not just theological terms and can used in everyday conversations in Language: Don’t Lose It – Use It.”

Michael looks at the commonly believed heresy of Spiritual Neutrality at Tantalizing but True.

Rodney wonders why people are turning their backs on God and asks if we need to take some responsibility for the way others see God in Losing our Religion.

Carina presents Journey to Somewhere.

Josh, from Church Hopping, wonders Who is the Angel of the Lord?

Laurie Bluedorn presents Greek and Hebrew Texts posted at Trivium Pursuit.

Patricia challenges us to find out where our priorities are in What Matters Most: Lessons from a Tornado.

Veracity takes a look at the reasons people get baptized or confirmed and wonders what our responsibility is when we see people doing it for the wrong reasons in To Confirm, or Not to Confirm?

Shang Pei Lin presents the Father’s Love.

Sherry offers a great review of the book Abide With Me by Elizabeth Strout.

Martin takes a look at the word Play in the Bible at Sun and Shield.

Nancy Geiger presents Someday posted at What I Learned Teaching Sunday School.

Heather Tenney presents part one of Protecting the Family posted at Truth in Politics.

Zach, from ZS Ramblings, offers a short discussion on whether a job should dictate who you are in You Are What You Do (or are you?).

In his second post on C.S. Lewis and Bible translation, Lingamish riffs on Bible translation wars, shopping as a spiritual exercise and the situational ethics of book borrowing in C.S. Lewis on Bible translation, part 2: More useful than the Authorized Version.

Thomas describes the blogging encounter he had on WorldMagBlog that sent him tumbling down the rabbit hole of the vague idea of pacifism, and starts fleshing out the complexities of being labeled a pacifist in the world we live in.

Annette finds it fascinating to watch How God Works.

Mick, from The Romans 15:4 Project, passes along a message from Gateways to Better Education on the President’s Proclamation for Religious Freedom Day.

Kim Anderson at Mother-Lode reminds us to keep our focus on the aim of discipline – restoring the soul – in her post, Comfort and Discipline.

Fresh from a complete site redesign, John at Light Along the Journey has a few thoughts about Christ’s command to Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.

Don Bosch over at The Evangelical Ecologist considers whether Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. would have become an advocate for environmental justice, and offers some thoughts on the state of inter-racial Christian ecologytoday at MLK.

Rev Bill raises the question: “Do Christians in other countries havesomething to teach us?”

Henry offers us an overview of Isaiah 27, and the final entry in his series on Isaiah 24-27, looking at Isaiah 27 as an early apocalypse in Isaiah 27: Accomplishing Redemption at the Participatory Bible Study Blog.

Ben presents an inspiring story of a missionary trying to reach a muslim tribe to explain what place short term missions holds in the field in Missions Theory.

John thought those involved in ministry, or just curious about how churches define themselves, might be interested in the outline of “The Membership Meeting” at his new church. Come over to Brain Cramps for God.

God, Inc. Episode 3

And now we’re current with the series. I’ll post the next installment as soon as it’s available.

God, Inc. Episode 2

For your viewing pleasure:

God, Inc. Episode 1

This is probably the best thing I’ve seen on You Tube yet. This new web series is the creation of Francis Stokes, and while I know nothing about him other than his name, he’s pretty darn cool.

So far only three episodes are posted, and I’ll post Episode 2 tomorrow and Episode 3 on Sunday. After that, I’ll post the new episodes when they’re available.

Hopefully you’ll enjoy these as much as I do. They’re pretty darn funny.

Warning: These are slightly irreverent and contain some profanity.

Catching Up

I know that my posting has been sporadic, at best, recently. Work got insanely busy, and in the middle of the chaos I missed two weeks due to a holiday vacation and snow days. I’m nearly caught up in the office now and should be able to resume a more normal posting schedule in a day or so. I’ve got a pile of things I’d like to post about, I just haven’t had time!

Hopefully I’ll get to catch up on some sleep too…but that’s doubtful, at least for the next month or so. DJ is keeping us all awake at night because his bladder isn’t big enough to make it through the night. And his sleep patterns are like a baby’s. He wants to sleep for 4 hours and play for 2. Unfortunately, his two mommies want to sleep for 8 hours!

Please welcome to the family…

This lil guy is DJ. He’s a 10 week old Blue Heeler mix that my roommate and I adopted from the humane society this weekend. Isn’t he too cute?

Are Animals Gay?

I just read a fascinating article written by Laurence Thomas, a man who does not think homosexuality is wrong, titled Are There Gay Animals? On Justifying Gay Behavior in Humans. (HT: Jeremy)

The basic premise of the article is pointing out the foolishness of the argument that homosexuality is found in nature so it must be natural for humans as well.

The issue is this: What might we infer about human beings from animal behavior?  The answer is not much.  And holding this view has nothing whatsoever to do with being for or against homosexuality among human beings.  Consider, for instance, that fidelity in the animal kingdom is relatively rare.  All the same, no one supposes that this is thereby a reason to eschew fidelity as an archaic notion of no relevance to human beings.  Again, in most instances, though not all, the male bares very little responsibility for raising the children that he sired.  Yet, we do not argue for moment that this is how human males should behave.  Indeed, our sentiments are exactly the opposite.  Then there is the reality that animals have little or no sense of shame with regard to when and where they relieve themselves, whether this is about urinating or defecating.  I can only hope that we should not regard this as virtuous.

[...]

In the end, then, appealing to animal behavior as some form of justification for human behavior is very tricky business.  If we pick some behaviors and eschew others, then we need an independent and defensible principle that explains why some animal behaviors fall on one side of the divide and other animal behaviors fall on the other side of the divide.  Appealing to animal behavior as a justification for human behavior is loathsomely self-serving when it turns out that the only animal behaviors that we pick out are those that serve our own ends. 

[...]

Strikingly, we humans do not think for a moment that the behavior of bears is an indication of how monkeys should behave, or conversely.  Likewise for whales and dolphins.  And so on across the board.  So it makes no sense to me that so many are so quick to invoke behavior among animal species as an indication of how the human species should behave. 

It seems to me that he makes some good points, though I encourage you to read the whole article. Remember, this article is NOT a stance against homosexuality; it is merely addressing the argument in question.

Gratitude

This song is on my heart for some reason. It’s one of the most beautiful songs I’ve heard in the CCM genre. Just close your eyes and listen to the words. Hopefully it will touch you too.

Eragon’s Theology

I just finished reading Eragon and Eldest, the first two books in the Inheritence trilogy. Both are fantastic. Christopher Paolini needs to hurry up and finish the last installment!

There’s one part in particular that I found interesting, and I immediately wanted to blog about it when I read it. And don’t worry, this excerpt won’t give away anything about the storyline or spoil anything. Eragon is in the middle of his training with the elves. He has just asked his teacher, Oromis, what religion the elves believe. Oromis tells him that they worship nothing; they do not worship at all.

     “Where do you think the world came from, then, if it wasn’t created by the gods?”
     “Which gods, Eragon?”
     “Your gods, the dwarf gods, our gods…someone must have created it.”
     Oromis raised an eyebrow: “I would not necessarily agree with you. But be as that may, I cannot prove that gods do not exist. Nor can I prove that the world and everything in it was not created by an entity or entities in the distant past. But I can tell you that in the millennia we elves have studied nature, we have never witnessed an instance where the rules that govern the world have been broken. That is, we have never seen a miracle. Many events have defied our ability to explain, but we are convinced that we failed because we are woefully ignorant about the universe and not because a deity altered the workings of nature.”
     “A god wouldn’t have to alter nature to accomplish his will,” asserted Eragon. “He could do it withing the system that already exists…He could use magic to affect events.”
     Oromis smiled. “Very true. But ask yourself this, Eragon: If gods exist, have they been good custodians of Alagaesia? Death, sickness, poverty, tyranny, and countless other miseries stalk the land. If this is the handiwork of divine beings, then they are to be rebelled against and overthrown, not given obeisance, obedience, and reverence.”
     “The dwarves believe–”
     “Exactly! The dwarves believe. When it comes to certain matters, they rely upon faith rather than reason. They have even been known to ignore proven facts that contradict their dogma.”
     “Like what?” demanded Eragon.
     “Dwarf priests use coral as proof that stone is alive and can grow, which also corroborates their story that Helzvog formed the race of dwarves out of granite. But we elves discovered that coral is actually an exoskeleton secreted by miniscule animals that live inside the coral. Any magician can sense the animals if he opens his mind. We explained this to the dwarves, but they refused to listen, saying that the life we felt resides in every kind of stone, although their priests are the only ones who are supposed to be able to detect the life in landlocked stones.”
     For a long time, Eragon stared out the window, turning Oromis’s words over in his mind. “You don’t believe in an afterlife, then.”
     “From what Glaedr said, you already knew that.”
     “And you don’t put any stock in gods.”
     “We give credence only to that which we can prove exists. Since we cannot find evidence that gods, miracles, and other supernatural things are real, we do not trouble ourselves about them. If that were to change, if Helzvog were to reveal himself to us, then we would accept the new information and revise our position.”
     “It seems a cold world without something…more.”
     “On the contrary,” said Oromis, “it is a better world. A place where we are responsible for our own actions, where we can be kind to one another because we want to and because it is the right thing to do instead of being frightened into behaving by the threat of divine punishment. I won’t tell you what to believe, Eragon. It is far better to be taught to think critically and then be allowed to make your own decisions than to have someone else’s notions thrust upon you. You asked after our religion, and I have answered you true. Make of it what you will.”

     Their discussion–coupled with his previous worries–left Eragon so disturbed that he had difficulty concentrating on his studies in the following days, even when Oromis began to show him how to sing to plants, which Eragon had been eager to learn.
     Eragon recognized that his own experiences had already led him to adopt a more skeptical attitude; in principle, he agreed with much of what Oromis had said. The problem he struggled with, though, was that if the elves were right, it meant that nearly all the humans and dwarves were deluded, something Eragon found difficult to accept. That many people can’t be mistaken, he insisted to himself.
    When he asked Saphira about it, she said, It matters little to me, Eragon. Dragons have never believed in higher powers. Why should we when deer and other prey consider us to be a higher power? He laughed at that. Only do not ignore reality in order to comfort yourself, for once you do, you make it easy for others to deceive you.

I find myself thinking very much like Eragon here. I do see logic and reason in the position that doesn’t believe in God. But, as he noted, billions of people are deluded if there is no God (and at this point, I mean any god at all…Hindu gods, Muslim gods, Mayan gods, the Christian God, etc). I don’t accept that. Without the existence of God, hopelessness exists. We do live in a world of death, sickness, poverty, tyranny, and countless other miseries. With no God, there’s no hope of ever having anything better. It’s only this. So when faced with a choice, I put my faith, my trust, and my hope in God.

Rent

I’m rewatching my favorite movie tonight: Rent. I absolutely love the movie, and would love to see the broadway musical. Something about this musical strikes a chord in me. If you’ve not seen it, it follows a year in the life of a group of 8 friends (ok, Benny isn’t really a “friend”) struggling to make it in New York City. They have an incredible closeness that I envy. They care about each other. They worry about each other. They love each other.

I want that.

I’m closer to it now than I’ve ever been. I’ve developed more close friendships in the last 2 years or so than I have in my entire life. But for some reason, I hold back. I’m terrified of rejection. I’m terrified that people will see all of my flaws and want nothing to do with me. I’ve opened up a lot more recently, but I can feel those old familiar fears coming back. I don’t know why.