Monthly Archives: August 2006

More on the age of the earth

I sat down and started rewatching the second half of The Age of the Earth by Kent Hovind. I had my pen and pad out to take notes so that I could write up the session and post it here. But then I thought, “Why?”

For starters, my own opinion of Hovind has changed a lot over the last few weeks. I think he is probably one of the most unChrist-like men on the planet. One of the things I got so upset about the last time I posted on this video series was that the majority of the response was evolutionists calling me stupid. I realized that when I watched the last video that Hovind does the exact same thing. He is continually calling evolutionists stupid, dumb, or my favorite, dumb on purpose. And he does it in the name of Christ!

I am not okay with that.

Then I realized that, while I still believe in a young earth and the literal account of Creation given in Genesis, using Dr. Hovind’s videos is not going to get anyone in the evolutionist circles to take me seriously. Even if his information is solid (as I believe some of it is), no one would listen simply because it came out of Hovind’s mouth.

And finally, I realized that in the general scheme of things, whether or not you believe in an old earth or a young earth, it doesn’t matter. These beliefs are not central to the Christian faith and they do not determine whether or not you are a follower of Christ. Bickering and fighting about it does more harm than good!

So, I will not be continuing to write up the video series, although I do welcome opinion and discussion on the topic.

Blogs who link here: Conservative Cat

Tags: , , , ,

More Questions from George

George Frodsham has posted more questions on his Help with God blog. This time, he asks, “Why is God bad at marketing?

Reading some of your answers, one thing I have discovered about religion (and perhaps Christianity in particular) is that it is very personal. This means that everyone has different opinions and interpretations of almost everything. There are very few people who believe exactly the same thing. I realise that these differences are only skin deep, and the underlying beliefs (the basic beliefs we discussed in my previous posts) are the same, but it still makes you think. The fact that there are so many interpretations shows one thing: Christianity and the messages of the Bible are ambiguous. So why doesn’t God make things clearer for us?

Please do not jump to the obvious response – ‘what right do you have to question the way God works’? I have been told this before, but I remain unconvinced by those who say that but cannot provide an answer to my questions. It is human nature to question beliefs and knowledge, and I belive that it is very important to do so.

I have always assumed that God wants us to believe in Him. Indeed if He loves all of mankind, then he should want as many people as possible to believe. If this is the case, why does He do such a terrible job at promoting Himself? Those of you who believe and find your belief unquestionable, have you never wondered why so many people aren’t believers? There are about 4.5 billion non-believers. Assuming that Christianity is ‘the one true religion’, why are so many people missing out on it? Here are the reasons I can think of:

  1. Education about Christianity is not wide spread enough.

  2. It is easier to find God (or think that you have) through other religions

  3. God only reveals himself to certain people

  4. Christianity is difficult to believe in, and those with a sceptical mind don’t think that there is enough evidence for it

  5. The Devil has corrupted 4.5 billion people so that they will go to hell (through reason 2?)

  6. 4.5 billion human minds are too corrupted to believe

In reasons 1 through 5, I have to think that God isn’t doing a very good job of getting people to believe in Him (assuming He wants us too). Being God, shouldn’t he be able to solve these problems without completely revealing Himself? He should be able to do it without us even noticing a difference. As for those of you who liked reason 6, isn’t it a sin to think that you are superior to 4.5 billion other human minds?

To compound this marketing problem, God also fills the world with ‘tests of faith’, which have been prominent throughout human history as we make discoveries. The whole ‘test of faith’ thing doesn’t make sense to me, and I have only ever heard it when a believer is unable to provide an explanation for something that goes against their beliefs. All I have said is with the assumption that God wants as many humans as possible to believe in Him. So I ask you these two questions:

  1. Does God want us to believe in Him?

  2. Why is He so bad at getting people to believe (yes, 2.1 billion people is a lot, but it also means two thirds of humans will burn in hell)?

George, I still think it’s great that you’re asking all of these questions. One question I have for you: What is your motivation? You’ve already stated that you’re not asking these because you’re seeking God.

You are right when you state that Christianity is very personal. However, that doesn’t mean that everyone can have their own personal opinions and interpretations. I love the way Eugene Peterson put it in The Message, “We couldn’t be more sure of what we saw and heard—God’s glory, God’s voice. The prophetic Word was confirmed to us. You’ll do well to keep focusing on it. It’s the one light you have in a dark time as you wait for daybreak and the rising of the Morning Star in your hearts. The main thing to keep in mind here is that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of private opinion. And why? Because it’s not something concocted in the human heart. Prophecy resulted when the Holy Spirit prompted men and women to speak God’s Word” (2 Peter 1:19-21, emphasis mine). The personal aspect of Christianity comes from how relational it is.

There are tons of doctrines and dogmatic leaders out there who insist that everything they believe is the right way to believe. Unfortunately, none of them are completely right. Humans are fallible beings. And, for the most part, those doctrines have no bearing on salvation. A friend of mine says it’s kind of like those relationships that end because of something like the toothpaste, the TP or the toilet seat. Those sorts of things aren’t deal breakers at all, but some people let the little things build up until they become huge problems.

And I don’t think God has done such a bad job promoting himself. Look back in history. Adam walked with God in the garden and he still chose to disobey God. The Israelites saw God’s power day after day, his mercy and kindness, and they still chose to rebel against God. God provided their food and their water. He parted water so they could walk on dry ground. He healed them. And they still chose to disregard His ways. It’s not so different today. The biggest difference being that we don’t have the physical manifestations of God on a daily basis the way they did. But then, we don’t need them either because we have everything we need to know laid out for us in the Bible.

Update: I found the answer to my question concerning George’s motives at The Sincerity of Questions.

Tags: ,

New Tenant

Check out my new renter Matt Jones’ Random Acts of Verbiage. You’ll have to click on the thumbnail in the right sidebar.

Matt is a Christian, and though we disagree about Creation Science, his blog is a must read.

This guy wants a terrorist attack

This article by Russell Shaw on the Huffington Post really makes me angry.

He asks the question, “What if another terror attack just before this fall’s elections could save many thousand-times the lives lost?”

Then he goes on to say that he “isn’t proud” of hypothesizing about this:

I am not proud of myself for even considering the notion that another terror attack that costs even one American life could ever be considered anything else but evil and hurtful. And I know that when I weigh the possibility that such an attack- that might, say, kill 100- would prevent hundreds of thousands of Americans from dying who otherwise would- I am exhibiting a calculating cold heart diametrically opposed to everything I stand for as a human being. A human being, who, just so you know, is opposed to most wars and to capital punishment.

But in light of the very real potential of the next two American elections to solidify our growing American persona as a warlike, polluter-friendly nation with repressive domestic tendencies and inadequate health care for so many tens of millions, let me ask you this. Even if only from the standpoint of a purely intellectual exercise in alternative future history:

If you knew us getting hit again would launch a chain of transformative, cascading events that would enable a better nation where millions who would have died will live longer, would such a calculus have any moral validity?

Um…NO!

Tags: ,

Christian Carnival 136

Christian Carnival 136 is up at Parableman.

Check it out. I won’t do any highlights this week because I’m exhausted and my allergies have flared up.

Enjoy.

Tags:

Where is God?

I received an email today from George Frodsham of http://helpwithgod.blogspot.com that was filled with questions about the Christian faith. I will do my best to answer them here.

George:

Your questions are good questions. I admire you for seeking the answers to these questions. I am no biblical scholar, I am only a follower of Christ. I will answer your questions to the best of my ability, hoping that, as I do, I do not merely confuse you. I fear my answers will be more subjective than a scholar’s answer, but I will do my best.

Let me preface this by saying that I am neither an atheist nor a Christian, and the questions and comments are not all originally mine.I am somewhat confused about religion. I fully admit that I do not know much about it (indeed this is an attempt to find out), but what I do know makes it difficult for me to understand how people can be believers. So I ask one big question – how do you know that you’re right? Here are some questions/problems I have about Christianity:

1. The Bible: many take the bible to be the word of God – most of the religious beliefs and practises are based on it. However, changes (accidental and deliberate) to the bible over the last 2000 years mean that less than half of the words now there are the original ones. So is God changing the bible to fit the times? That’s the only explanation I see, but we have stumbled across a problem. Not only do we have hundreds of different versions of the bible, but we have also become so good at copying it that we don’t make ‘mistakes’ anymore. So how will God modify it?

God hasn’t modified his word through the ages. There are different versions, sure. But they are all based on the same original manuscripts. And some are literal translations, some are paraphrases, some are commentary. That doesn’t make them all different. They all (for the most part) contain the same information…the same information that was written in the original manuscripts.

2. Selflessness: from what I understand, one of the most important things about living a Christian life is being ‘good’, and that often means being selfless. So doing things only because you benefit from them is a sin. But why are people ‘good’? To go to heaven. Ask any Christian why they follow God’s word and the answer is so that they can go to heaven. Isn’t this the same thing as saying ‘I’m only good because I get a reward’? Sounds a little bit selfish to me… Those of you thinking that you are not ‘good’ for selfish reasons answer me this: would you still be ‘good’ if doing so sent you to hell?

I want to combine my answer for 2 and 3 so see below.

3. Different interpretations: everybody interprets the bible differently. Is this ok? Christians with the same fundamental beliefs live their lives in very different ways. Not all believe that premarital sex is wrong, not all believe that being homosexual is wrong, some think that you should go to church every day etc… So where is the line? Are there some basic beliefs that if you hold, you will go to heaven, as long as you’re ‘good’? Come to that, is it enough to just be ‘good’? Are these the basic beliefs:
a. God exists
b. Jesus was the son of God
c. He saved us
d. We should be nice people
If they are, what was the big deal about the Da Vinci Code? Surely it’s anyone’s right to believe that as much as the bible – the evidence for both is about the same anyway. And they are upholding the basic beliefs.

The first thing to understand is that not everyone who says they are a Christian is a Christian. There are some basic misconceptions and stereotypes surrounding Christianity that are fueled by people who claim to be Christian but do not understand what it means to be a Christian. Spirit-filled believers, those who have an active relationship with Christ, do not serve God “to get to heaven” as you have suggested. We serve God because He deserves no less than our praise, worship, and service. He is our Almighty Creator and, despite our sinful tendencies, has bestowed upon us more grace than we can handle! Each and every one of us deserve to go to hell. Why? Because of our sinful natures. Humans chose to seperate themselves from God, yet God, in His infinite love and mercy, still chose to give us a way to get to Him. That is why we choose to live by the standards God has set forth in the Bible.

It isn’t enough to be “good.” What does good mean? Whose definition of good would you go by? God was pretty clear that “there is none righteous, no not one” (Romans 3:11) and that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23). It isn’t “good” people who go to heaven, it’s forgiven people. The “basic beliefs” as you call them can be found in Romans 10:9: “That if you confess with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” Basically, believe in God, know that Jesus is God’s Son who was sent to die for you, acknowledge Him as Lord of your life, and believe in the resurrection.

As a Christian, I didn’t see a “big deal” with The Da Vinci Code. It was a work of fiction. I read it with that in mind and found it to be an interesting work. The people who were up in arms about it were so, in my opinion, because they are not confident enough in their own beliefs to be able to handle someone challenging those beliefs.

4. Lack of miracles: miracles were the evidence that Jesus provided to show he was the son of God. A miracle, by definition, is something occurring that should be impossible (not unlikely). So when was the last miracle? Has one ever happened to you? Was it what made you a believer? A disease being cured doesn’t count – that is merely unlikely, and just as many people have died even though people were praying for them. However, something like an amputee’s leg growing back – that works.

As far as miracles go…whoever said a straightened hand is more spectacular than a healed heart? I can’t take credit for that question, I believe Bill Bright is the mind behind it, but I have to agree. It is a miracle whenever someone’s bitter broken heart is restored and made whole by the love of God.

5. Talking to God: many believers say that they believe in God because he talks to them. If someone says that they hear voices telling them what to do, we usually send them to an asylum. How do you know you are different to them? Secondly, why is it that God hasn’t spoken to billions of people, including me? This seems a little unfair considering he is supposed to love all humans equally.

God doesn’t speak audibly. At least not to me. I’ve never heard an actual “voice” that I can attribute to God. What I have is His Holy Spirit dwelling in me. And with the help and guidance of the Holy Spirit I am able to discern truth from falsehood. When I read His word, the Holy Spirit will point out particular passages that apply to something I am currently facing. The Holy Spirit acts as a guide, a conscience, if you will. It is that “voice” that believers hear. And nonbelievers, who do not have the Holy Spirit dwelling within them, have a much harder time hearing that voice. But, they do. If they didn’t no one would ever convert to Christianity! The very act of becoming a Christian is listening to God’s voice.

6. Other religions: if Christianity is the one true religion (and believers of other religions are going to hell), God is again being unfair to the billions of people who are never educated about Christianity, and never have a chance to believe in it. And it works the same the other way around. How many of you have been educated about every different religion and still choose Christianity? If you are brought up as a Muslim, you will be a Muslim. If you are brought up as a Hindu, you will be a Hindu. Or is it that it doesn’t matter which religion you believe in, just that you believe in a higher power? If that is the case, why do we have a bible?

To steal a quote from a movie…”God is like the wind. I can’t see it, but I can feel it.” And while Christianity isn’t based on feelings, that’s a pretty accurate description. I have actually studied other religions. I was even dabbling in Wicca for awhile there. But there’s no away around John 14:6. Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No man comes to the Father but by me” (emphasis mine). And why would you expect God, master of the Universe, to be limited by your definition of “fair”? And I would venture to say that there are few people out there who have never heard of Christianity. With today’s technology, all of the first and second world countries have ready access to the knowledge of Christianity…and most third world countries have missionaries who are spreading the Gospel. The Bible has been translated into so many different languages just so folks could have the knowledge and choose for themselves.

Tags: ,

Silence is not an option

I was reading through some old posts from my old xanga blog. I found one that I think is particularly relevant to the recent events I’ve blogged about.

Reposted from December 1, 2005:

One thing I’ve learned recently is that most people have such a poor view of Christianity. The world is bent to think one way, when in reality, Christianity–not the religion, but the lifestyle of living with and like Christ–is something completely different. And I seem to be content with staying silent. It’s not my problem. Let God handle it. Let the preachers deal with it. And I am wrong. I read this tonight*:

Words have power. So does silence. Words can be used for good or evil. So can silence. And we are responsible for how we use both. In this great country of ours we have been given many rights, including the right of free speech. To say what we think and believe. But we don’t often talk about the fact that exercising that right has consequences. And how we respond–or don’t respond–to those exercising that right also has consequences. …if I don’t correct wrong assumptions, they become bigger than life and actually become true. Because silence speaks. There’s an old saying…If you aren’t part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. I didn’t want to believe that. Because it demands that I stand up and be counted for what I believe. Just like many brave men and women who have shown us the path to brotherhood against the forces of prejudice and fear. And many paid for courage with their lives. I don’t know if I’m that brave. But there is no middle ground. Silence is not an option, because the voices of hate and division and violence are growing stronger.

When I read those words, God pierced me. Silence is not an option. And I have no idea what to do about it. How do I reach people? How do I love people? How do I learn to truly live for God and leave my own selfish pursuits behind? Will I ever measure up? Not without the Holy Spirit, that’s for sure!!

I’m not sure where God is taking me with this one, but I’m asking you to join me in prayer. Pray that Christians remain silent no longer. Pray that we can stand in unity and fight for Christ. Pray that we can prevail over the gates of hell by loving everyone who crosses our paths.

* The italicized quote is from Neta Jackson’s The Yada-Yada Prayer Group Gets Tough

Tags: , ,

God’s grace

I figured out last night why I’ve been struggling with my own depravity versus God’s grace. Even though I know this isn’t true, my brain has somehow convinced me that there’s a limit to God’s grace and I’ve reached it. The verse that comes to mind whenever I cognitively think about this is Hebrews 10:26-27: “If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God.”

I’ve read that the author of Hebrews was talking about a return to the law here, but I’m not convinced. This verse has always confused me and, more often than not, I’ve ignored it simply because I don’t understand it.

I found this posted at grace unzipped:

What meaneth the “willful” sin?  The answer is so simple that we overlook it.  Our confusion multiplies by an examination of that bogus effort to determine the difference between “willful sins” and “non-willful sins” in our desperate attempt to justify as many sins as possible under the excuse that we didn’t know we were sinning!  Our insanity in this is incredible!  How do we so easily by-pass the previous amazing demands that Christ has taken care of EVERY sin so that there is now NO MORE REMEMBRANCE OF SIN?  And if there is no more remembrance of sin there is no need for any more sacrifices for sin. 

Why did the writer use this term, “sinning willfully,” if not to distinguish between “willful” and “non-willful” sins?  Because he was driving the truth home that a return to the LAW is a return to SIN.  Law puts sin back in the forefront of the consciousness so that it FORCES a willful choice to follow sin.  You can turn to the left, or you can turn to the right, but you CANNOT stay on the path held out to you by the Law.  Those who thought they did not stray had only been proven to be deceived by their own self-righteousness – hence, the words Jesus so powerfully spoke to the people about hypocrisy.  What law really holds forth to the flesh is nothing more than a choice to SIN – one way of the other! 

The believing Jews in Israel that were not dispersed by the persecution against them over the years had found themselves surrounded by MANY who had come to “claim the name of Jesus” because it had become the thing to do.  Plain and simple, many of those in Israel had adapted their religion to INCLUDE Jesus, but had not experienced any real deliverance from his Spirit because they had not received him.  It was merely a religious conformity. 

And because of this, those who did believe were encouraged to adapt BACK into a system that had rejected the same Christ it was now including as part of their “talk” and rituals.  So, the question begs to be asked: what kind of a “savior” were the believing Jews perceiving Jesus Christ to be at this time in their lives?  A return to that old sense of “need” for the old sacrifices tells all.  For what had the Law turned those believers’ experiences into?  They were living as though life was merely a succession of choosing one sin after another!  “For if we go on sinning willfully after receiving the knowledge of the truth”.  This was their current bogus lifestyle!

What do you think?

Tags: ,

I was wrong

I’ve reared my ugly head again. If you read my previous post, you know what I’m talking about. I allowed my anger to speak rather than my love for the Lord. I fear I’ve done more harm than good. The exchange went on a bit further than what I posted below, and I’m downright ashamed of my childish behaviour. I did apologize to Naomi, but I fear that isn’t good enough.

I’m never going to be good enough for God; I know that. But do I have to keep proving it on a daily basis?

Am I wrong?

As you know, I’ve been participating in discussions about creation/evolution. Some of the discussion happened here, but a lot of it is happening over at the Martian Anthropologist. I’ve been involved in a discussion over there with a woman named Naomi. Naomi hates Christians. She hates anything having to do with Christians and is very quick to point that out. She and I have certainly gotten into it in the past. One reason I think she hates me so much is because I have consistently broken the stereotypes about Christians that she holds. Anyway, I want to post our most recent skirmish because I want to know if I handled it badly.

Warning: I will not censor her post, and she uses some language.

Naomi:

Amanda: Why would you carry a knife to a gunfight?

If I was going to be arguing against evolution, I wouldn’t choose a discredited pseudo-academic like Kent Hovind. He knows just enough to convince clueless fundies of his credentials and “research”; but he isn’t bright enough to talk his way out of a college broom closet! What a hoot that you would be suckered by this charlatan.

My question to you is: why are you such an agent provocateur? I’ve noticed that every time things get calm around here, you bring up evolution. Why is that? You’ve done it three times in the last four weeks. What’s up with you, Amanda? Do you feel the best defense is a good offense? Have you learned misdirection and obfuscation at Karl Rove’s dirty knees? Or was this something you learned at home, growing up in a fundie family?

Are you now going to start complaining that I pick on you? That the rhetoric is too “mean” for you again? I’ve always wondered why you hang out here anyway. You’re just another whimpering apologist like the long-suffering AG (a friend of yours, perhaps? your tag-team partner, maybe?). You’re both masochists with passive-agressive tendencies and a litany of enabling excuses for your faith and your god.

Why the fuck do you bother, Amanda?

I replied:

Naomi, you are a bitter old woman. What has happened to you to send you into this kind of frenzy everytime someone who opposes your belief system speaks up?

Now, if you had actually read what I’ve written you’d know exactly why I’ve brought it up.

The purpose of the entry, in my mind, was to open a dialogue that goes beyond simple bashing and name calling (I’m not saying that’s what you did). Most people don’t understand why or how someone can believe in Creation. I’m laying those ideas down.

Basically, I’m tired of the typical Athiest/Christian banter where each side tells the other they’re wrong. That doesn’t get either side anywhere.

I wrote today:

I’m not a scientist. I don’t have a PhD. Heck, I’ve only done 1 semester towards a MA. Before recently, I’d never even thought about why I believe in Creation other than the Bible says so. Now that I’m studying it, I see a lot of things that make sense (obviously you disagree). But I can’t really get anybody to give me a straight answer about what’s wrong with it. I get a lot of “you’re stupid” or “you need a brain” but that isn’t going to change anything (not that I think my mind can be changed, but at least I’m willing to listen).

And I am willing to listen.

I think what I did was pretty ballsy. You may think it’s stupid. But writing a Creationist post on a Christian blog and then inviting this lot to rip it up? Why on earth would I want to do that unless I was being sincere in my quest? I don’t have the desire to be bashed. No one in their right mind would willingly put themselves through that unless they were trying to learn something. Martian asked me last night if I am honestly seeking the truth or if I think I have it and am trying to defend it. That’s a fair question. As far as God goes, I think that I have the truth and will defend it. As far as the creation/evolution stuff goes, it’s somewhere in between.

You asked why I keep bringing up the topic…there are a few answers to that. I certainly never did it intentionally because “it was calm.” I disagree with that statement anyways…it’s never calm around here when Martian posts something that talks about religion (and it was his post about God hypothetially being a six year old that sparked this). But it has been brought up by me recently because that’s what we’re learning about in my small group. We’re going through Dr. Hovind’s series so it’s been on my mind. So when Martian mentioned something that Dr. Hovind had (in my mind) refuted, I brought it up. And you’ll have to refresh my memory for where I brought it up elsewhere because that one comment is the only one I can think of where I was the instigator. This entire thread came as a result of Martian posting about something I wrote on my own blog, not here.

She replied:

Amanda, you were only half right–I am an old woman. But I’m not bitter. “Bitter” says I have lived a life of constant disappointment. Yet, nothing could be farther from the truth. I am a complex woman, capable of many things, and a genius at one or two. My life has been lived fully and happily, despite a few setbacks and two tragedies.

My world has been filled with knowledge on many subjects. Can you say, that age fourteen (or any age, really) that you decided to learn the Greek alphabet? I can. For no more reason than that I wanted to. I was an early reader, and forever an avid reader. My friend Kathy calls me an “information sponge”. Can you say that? I find joy in learning about all sorts of things, about all kinds of cultures. Can you say that?

I have never tried to narrow my life to just one issue and “fit the policy around that point”. In becoming a Lutheran in 1984, I was almost kicked out of bible study classes because my questions were “too probing”, too “analytical”. But the pastor was too boring, too dogmatic for me. And I hate to be bored. That’s also why I quit the National Organization of Women. I’ve rarely, outside of religious groups, seen such a bunch of joyless women. I’ve also belonged to groups that were dynamic and productive, that had the ability to find humor in uncommon situations, while advancing the mission.

I have found that sometimes chaos can be a good thing. At times like that, it’s a whirlwind blowing the stultifying fog of everyday life out of one’s brain. Some of the most exciting things that have happened to me have been the result of great change. And I expect that I’m not done being changed, being challenged by life, being required to think in large pictures, needing to act in bold ways. Can you say that, Amanda?

I may be an old woman–after all, I’ve never pretended to be young on this blog–but I’ve never been a silly, young woman, so sure of her god concept that she’d go to her death for it, head high with a pride that is condemned in her own book. I know you must be embarassed to find your “scientist” was a fraud; if you aren’t embarassed, you should be. Here’s a piece of wisdom you won’t take: beware of your authorities! The denial system that props you and your like up is fragile. That is why you get so upset when the flaws in your reasoning are pointed out to you. But don’t feel alone–other fundies are experiencing it, too, even as we speak. Not just in this country but all over the world.

Religion is irrelevant; it’s an anachronism, an anomaly, a non-sequitur in our forward progress. More wisdom you won’t accept: you can’t stop time; you can’t roll it back to 1958, 1885, 1492, 1066 or 33ce; you can’t put the genie back in the bottle. But your need for god will prevent you from understanding what wisdom is. It keeps you in pre-adolescent acceptance of the status quo, of trusting in the words of your religious leaders. That works very well for them: without you and the other followers, they would be out of a job. Like buggy-whip makers in the early days of cars… Amanda, they have a vested interest in keeping you hooked on your religious meme.

Yes, I admit it, I pick on you. You seem to want to be martyred for your faith. I can continue to be one of Mel (The Anti-Semite) Gibson and you can continue to be the crucified christ. We can keep this up until one of us leaves. But don’t expect it to be me; after all, it’s a mystery why you even hang out here. You don’t really contribute anything new. It’s always the same programmed line that was taught to you from before you could speak. The same line that was taught to your parents and their parents and so on, back into antiquity.

It just occured to me why you’re here–you’re honing your skills for overcoming resistance to religion when you go out into the world on your recruiting missions. What better place to learn how to turn the conversation, to “baffle them with bullshit”, to smother them with words until they sign up just to get you to shut up. Fucking brilliant! If you survive in the belly of the atheist beast, you can survive anywhere, right?

We’re offering a free, introductory 12-Step recovery program, if you’re interested. “Break the god habit, in 28 Days.” For a change, you can be our guinea pig!

So I said:

It’s increasingly evident that you don’t read what I write before you decide to sound off about it. If you had read it, you would know that your statements like this, “It keeps you in pre-adolescent acceptance of the status quo, of trusting in the words of your religious leaders are wrong. I don’t blindly accept what “religious leaders” tell me anymore. I used to. Oh yes ma’am. For years I thought the KJV was “God’s preserved word in the English language” simply because I was taught that way. And if the preacher said it…then it must be right. But I learned better. Preachers, pastors, religious leaders…all are very fallible human beings. I don’t blindly accept anything a human says. Which again, is part of why I have been posting what I posted. It’s why I invited this group to participate in the discussion.

You seem to not be able to fathom that, Naomi. You have this idea of who I am so firmly ingrained in your head that you simply can’t accept any other alternative. Well I’m not who you think I am. I’ve not quoted Dr. Hovind or anyone else as gospel truth. I outlined what he taught in his video. I commented that I believe it to be true. I’m also fully aware that the people here do not believe it to be true. That’s where the discussion part comes in…but you seem to not know how to discuss differences of opinion.

You’ve asked twice now why I even come around here. There are a couple of reasons:

1) I respect the hell out of Martian.
2) I don’t want to be in a “Christian bubble” where the only people I interact with share my beliefs.
3) I am always challenged here. My beliefs are always challenged. Participating here has helped me grow. I’ve started to question some things and other beliefs have grown more solid.
4) I’m tougher than I look, and stubborn. I’m not going anywhere just because you pick on me.

So, am I wrong? I feel as if I’m goading her in some way, and that’s not my intention at all.

Tags: , ,