Monthly Archives: July 2006

To be or not to be…Christian?

by Mandi

There’s a telling post over on Colossians Three Sixteen today about the band Switchfoot–more accurately it’s about Christian artists and Christian music, but Switchfoot is the illustration. It’s obvious Brent has a bias against the band, but his post is thought provoking and worth looking at. His information comes from a book called Body Piercing Saved My Life: Inside the Phenomenon of Christian Rock by Andrew Beaujon.

Many so-called “Christian” artists have have purportedly “crossed over” into the “mainstream” market (reinforcing the notion that the “Christian” market is nothing more than a niche market, but that’s for another day). Some of these artists have had varying degrees of commercial success while others have had varying degrees of success living out their faith in the public eye.

He then goes on to talk about something that troubled him–an interview Beaujon had with Switchfoot.

Setting up an interview with Switchfoot was not easy. The band’s publicist was concerned that I would portray them as Christian rockers, which seemed like a curious concern when the band in question was playing at a Christian rock festival, but it’s quite a serious matter when that same band has crossed over to what Christians call the ‘general market.’

What’s interesting here is exactly what Beaujon so keenly points out. Many artists do not want to be known as Christians, even while playing Christian venues to Christians. Beaujon continues, recounting a discussion with Switchfoot member Jonathan Foreman:

I asked if this was the only Christian event Switchfoot played.

He lowered his eyes.

“You have to be – the thing is, when you’re talking about Switchfoot, you’re talking about music that we’ve fought really hard to keep out of boxes,” he said.

I’m not interesting in ‘proving’ you guys are a Christian rock band,” I told him. “But this is a Christian festival.”

“That’s the thing,” he replied. “If we’re gonna stay out of the box, we’re gonna have to be very conscientious of what everything is saying. Even opening up for Kid Rock [which they had done earlier that year] says something. Like everything in life, any relationship is a compromise. But where we’re at right now, we’re fortunate enough to pick the shots, and this is one of the festivals that, for the most part, it’s a lot of people that are, you know, searching spiritually. It’s actually a bunch of people that want to see the world change for the beter. I don’t know, that’s important to me.”

Beaujon concludes:

Foreman’s insistence that Switchfoot came to Cornerstone to connect with these radicals was beginning to sound more and more like cognitive dissonance. Especially in light of the fact that the same summer, Switchfoot played at two other Christian festivals and showed up for the Dove Awards – the Christian Grammys – where they took home three statues. It’s easy to understand why Switchfoot would want to avoid being known as a Christian rock band, but they also seemed to want to have it both ways.

This is unfortunately becoming all too common in our society. They can’t (won’t?) articulate their faith because they may lose fans. They accept the Christian awards and enjoy the success their music receives from airtime on stations like KLOVE or Way FM. But at a Christian festival they have to be “outside the box.” They don’t want the label. If that’s how they act at a Christian festival, how do they act when they open for Kid Rock?

Brent said it all much better than I ever could. Read his post and comment over there.

Tags: , , ,


Today, I am proud of our President

by Mandi

President Bush will cast his first veto today.

The Senate has sent a bill across his desk that would approve federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research.

The new bill, supported by a clear majority of Americans in several polls, would allow federally funded research using excess embryos from fertility clinics, which would otherwise be thrown out. Supporters say they should be used to search for cures for illnesses ranging from diabetes to paralysis.

The best part? Bush has repeatedly stated that he would veto this bill if it came across his desk.

“The president has had a clear principled stand on this issue since August of 2001 and he has made clear from the beginning that if this bill came to him he would veto it and so this is what he’s going to do today,” spokeswoman Dana Perino said.

Neither the Senate nor the House think they could come up with the necessary two-thirds majority to override his veto. But they still passed it. Does anybody else see the utter ridiculousness of this? They’re spending a lot of time and energy trying to pass a bill that just won’t happen. That’s time and energy that could be better spent elsewhere.

But, despite all of that, I am proud of our President today. I am proud that he has taken a stand and he isn’t compromising on it. I am proud that he values human life. And make no mistake. Embryos are human life. It’s easy to think of them as some “thing.” There’s no hair color or eye color or fingers or toes. But life begins at conception, and these tiny embryos have as much life in them as you or I do.

Thank you, President Bush.

Blogs who link here: Pursuing Holiness, Conservative Cat

Tags: , , ,


Let’s kill our baby because she might not be perfect…

by Mandi

A while back I posted about a woman who wrote a letter to the editor about her choice to kill her baby. Today I read about another one (HT: Freeman Hunt). This woman chose to kill her baby because she might be slightly mentally underdeveloped.

And now our unexpected late-life gift, our 19-week-old miracle is turning out to be tragically flawed. A dreaded extra chromosome — a triple X — has robbed us of a healthy baby, the geneticist quietly tells us our child will be significantly lower functioning than other children. Definitely not the treasured only child, the little athlete, we had only so recently and so tentatively allowed ourselves to dream about.

Because this child would not be the “treasured only child,” they choose to abort the baby. I don’t understand these people. She even calls her daughter a baby. Yet she still kills it.

Read the editorial here.

Read Dan Phillips’ response here.

Blogs that link here: Pursuing Holiness, Conservative Cat, Dumb Ox News

Tags: ,


If You Want Happiness…

by Mandi

Randy’s blog is one I read daily. Today he posted a photo slideshow put together by his friend Jordan that is fabulous. The photos are gorgeous, and the message is even better.

Check it out.

Tags:


The MSM is the enemy

by Mandi

Does anybody besides the MSM actually think this is okay? (HT: Laura)

New York Times photographer Joao Silva was right there in the room as a member of Muqtada al-Sadr’s “Mahdi Army” tried to kill American troops: The New York Times – New York Region – Slide Show – Slide Show: Memorable Photographs.

It seems that in 1989 there was a forum on PBS in which Mike Wallace and Peter Jennings were presented with a hypothetical question. What would they do if they were in the position to warn US troops of an attack? Would they warn of the attack, or simply cover the story? Ultimately, both of them agreed that as reporters they did not have a higher duty to try and save lives. They would photograph the attack and report it.

Journalists make my blood boil these days. Their nonexistant ethics are an outrage! How can anyone justify what the MSM has been? Publishing information on government programs to track terrorists. Publishing classified material. What has the world come to?

Here’s a post about this photographer that is passionate and true.

Tags: , , ,


An Exchange on Gay Christians

by Mandi

While going through this week’s Christian Carnival, I came across the following series of posts. I have to say I agree with Funky Dung, but I appreciate how both sides were able to discuss their differences of opinion without calling names or getting angry.

Both sides are articulate and intelligent. I encourage you to read through them (none of the posts are incredibly long).

Tags: ,


What’s so wrong with Theocracy?

by Mandi

There’s an interesting article by Philip Yancey in Christianity Today (HT: Zach). He talks of the cultural differences between the Islamic state and the rest of the world, essentially.

Several years ago a Muslim man said to me, “I find no guidance in the Qur’an on how Muslims should live as a minority in a society and no guidance in the New Testament on how Christians should live as a majority.” He put his finger on a central difference between the two faiths. One, born at Pentecost, tends to thrive cross-culturally and even counterculturally, often coexisting with oppressive governments. The other, geographically anchored in Mecca, was founded simultaneously as a religion and a state.

As a result, in strict Muslim countries, religion, culture, and politics are unified. Whereas in the U.S. school boards debate the legality of one-minute nonsectarian prayers at football games, in Muslim countries commerce and transportation screech to a halt at the call to prayer five times a day. Many Muslims seek the official adoption of Shari’ah law, derived from sacred writings and similar to the all-encompassing code in the Pentateuch.

Fueled by theocratic zeal, Islam conquered three-fourths of all Christian territory during the Middle Ages. In response Christians, who had little tradition of holy war, launched the Crusades. Over time, the Christian West separated church and state and fostered a respect for religious freedom. Ultimately, Europe became identified as a “post-Christian” culture. Notably, there are no comparable “post-Muslim” societies except in regions where Islam was evicted by force.

He illustrates this difference by using the Danish cartoon controversy as an example. Quoting an American who lives in Egypt:

The foundation of Arab society is not the individual, but the community: first, the family, then the extended family or clan, then the religious community, and sometimes then the nation. With this worldview, if cartoonists in Denmark insult Islam and their prophet, and if the leader of Denmark (the “Danish community”) does not denounce it outright, then Muslims here interpret him to be saying that he and the Danes endorse the cartoons and insults. While the Danish prime minister publicly expressed his disapproval of the cartoons, he also shared that it was not illegal in Denmark, as there is freedom of expression and press for individuals. Ironically, this statement was interpreted by the Islamic community as endorsing and supporting the cartoons. The two cultural worldviews were not able to understand each other at all.

The purpose of Yancey’s article was to warn Christians how close we are to turning towards “our own version of the harsh fundamentalism sweeping Islam today.” He gives examples of Christians being thankful for such rules as a man proving the woman he’s with is his wife before being allowed to check into a hotel. His premise is that in the Christian’s effort to raise their children moral and righteous we step into the same plane as that of Islam.

My question is: Is that really so bad? Now I’m not talking about militant Islam. I’m talking about the fundamentalism that guides this group of people to care more about the group than the individual. I’m talking about the theocracy of Islam. I’m talking about how their beliefs dictate what they do–in every aspect.

We were created a theocracy. The government God established was a theocracy. And no, I’m not talking about the United States of America. When God created humans and he established government, we were a theocracy. There was no higher authority than God. He created the laws, and He created the consequences. I’m not suggesting that we need to live under levitical law. Read your Bible and you’ll understand why we don’t do that anymore. But God is the ultimate authority. A theocracy recognizes that (in theory).

Tags: , , , ,

Blogs linked here: Pursuing Holiness — Open Trackbacks Possibilities Edition


More on HPV

by Mandi

There’s a great article on Pursuing Holiness that directs your attention to two articles over on PoliPundit. They make the assertion that if the government will require all school aged females to receive the HPV vaccine, then it should also require all males to be circumcised because it has been proven that circumcision greatly reduces the risk of HIV.

Laura writes:

Oak Leaf at Polipundit is also pro-choice on this issue. In response to some commenters who argued along these lines-

“The policy of not admitting children without vaccines is not only aimed at preventing infection in elementary school, but its goal is also to create a society full of immune individuals, since so many people go to public schools.

Making it mandatory for admittance into schools is a convenient way of making sure that this disease dies out quickly.”

he then upped the ante by pointing out that circumcision can reduce the risk for HIV, so should we now enforce circumcision for all boys?

Interesting idea. If making it mandatory for girls to be vaccinated against an STD is logical, mandatory circumcision is equally logical. But it doesn’t go far enough.

Boys are far more at risk for HIV, and the vast majority of HIV infections are due to sex. 73% of all HIV diagnoses in 2004 were for males. Of all 2004 HIV diagnoses, 81% of male, and 78% of female HIV infection are due to sex.

Consequently I suggest that the solution is to put a stop to all teenage sex. And in keeping with the idea that girls who wish to attend school should receive a mandatory STD vaccination, I think that it’s only sensible to require all boys to undergo chemical castration if they want to attend school.

I’m sure, presented with these facts about HIV transmission, that the people who demand mandatory HPV vaccination will agree with me. After all, who doesn’t want to protect children from HIV/AIDS?

Tags: , , ,


Is that really Donald Miller?

by Mandi

I saw a picture today labeled “Donald Miller” that I really don’t think looks like the man. I googled for pictures of him and that particular photo came up several times, labeled as Donald Miller. Even the Thomas Nelson website uses this picture on their author page. But I leave it to you to decide. Are these two pictures of the same man?

        

I just don’t see it.

Tags:


Internet Marketing Coordinator and Copywriter needed

by Mandi

I work at the Denver Rescue Mission and we are currently hiring for two positions in my department.

Internet Marketing Coordinator (MOC): A FT exempt position responsible for coordinating Internet activity to generate increased donations, administer Web site operations, HTML, online store and monthly emails, develop strategic relationships with Internet partners, oversee implementation of online marketing and lead online strategies including marketing and creativity. Requires BA degree in Marketing, Business or related field, strong computer skills and familiarity with Web development tools, solid communication and analytical skills, effective Web copywriting skills, and creativity with a willingness to grow professionally. Work location is 3501 E. 46th Avenue, Denver, CO 80216.

Copywriter (MOC): A PT non-exempt position responsible for producing clear and persuasive copy for fundraising pieces, maintaining consistency in messaging, language and branding, researching, conceptualizing and writing monthly newsletters and annual report, producing interesting and information copy, and participating in team brainstorming. Requires degree in related field, background in print journalism and/or advertising, strong computer skills, excellent interpersonal skills, familiarity with editing/print processes, and ability to handle multiple projects.. Work location is 3501 E. 46th Avenue, Denver, CO 80216.

If you’re interested, please go to the website and follow the application instructions.


Scrappy Theme by Caroline Moore | Copyright 2012 Simply Mandi Kaye | Powered by WordPress