Monthly Archives: June 2006

Politically Uncorrect

This song just makes me want to holler “Amen!”

• Politically Uncorrect • | by Gretchen Wilson
I’m for the low man on the totem pole
And I’m for the underdog God bless his soul
And I’m for the guys still pulling third shift
And the single mom raisin’ her kids
I’m for the preachers who stay on their knees
And I’m for the sinner who finally believes
And I’m for the farmer with dirt on his hands
And the soldiers who fight for this landChorus:

And I’m for the Bible and I’m for the flag
And I’m for the working man, me and ol’ hag
I’m just one of many
Who can’t get no respect
Politically uncorrect

(Merle Haggard)
I guess my opinion is all out of style
(Gretchen Wilson)
Aw, but don’t get me started cause I can get riled
And I’ll make a fight for the forefathers plan
(Merle Haggard)
And the world already knows where I stand

Repeat Chorus

(Merle Haggard)
Nothing wrong with the Bible, nothing wrong with the flag
(Gretchen Wilson)
Nothing wrong with the working man me & ol’ hag
We’re just some of many who can’t get no respect
Politically uncorrect
(Merle Haggard)
Politically uncorrect

Tags: , ,

Valedictorian

There’s a great post over at The Rogue Angel about valedictorians who were punished by speaking about their faith during their speeches. One wasn’t allowed to give her speech and the other had her diploma withheld!

Last week I posted about how a school pulled the plug on a Valedictorian’s speech for talking about her faith in Christ. Well, now another school is in the news for withholding it’s Valedictorian’s diploma after she spoke about her faith!

It must be in the water. Today, I read about how another Valedictorian complained about how his education was hollow … during his speech.

The valedictorian of a Blue Ribbon-awarded high school in New Jersey has left teachers and administrators with a sour taste in their mouths after using his June 20 valedictory speech to describe his education as “hollow” and one filled with “countless hours wasted in those halls.”

“I felt like the most important questions were not asked.” said Kareem Elnahal, the top rated student at Mainland Regional High School in Linwood, N.J. “Things like ethics, things that defined who we are, were ignored so in that way I thought it was hollow.” he told Cybercast News Service Wednesday.

The kids are definitely trying to tell us something. Read the rest.

Update 1:54 PM: Barb has a whole post on the Valedictorian whose diploma was withheld. Check it out.

Tags: , ,

The Examined Life–Which Bible is she reading?

There’s a great post over at The Examined Life called Which Bible is she reading?

She (he?) takes a look at the assertion that Christ’s message was only about “love and acceptance.”

Check it out.

Tags: , ,

Dirty Girls

There’s an article in Relevant Magazine by a woman named Anne Jackson. She tells a very personal and painful story of her addiction to porn. It’s not only a man’s addiction.

Of course I never mentioned my struggle to anyone. Looking at porn was typical, even expected, for guys but a girl? A girl who likes porn? I often questioned my sexual orientation.

As hard as it is for me to admit this, while I was reading her story I felt as if I were reading an account of my own struggle.

I’ve never admitted that in public before. Only a select few know that I have struggled with an addiction to pornography. Some of you who are reading this right now are probably shocked beyond belief. But reading Anne’s story has given me the courage to say it. This may not count as saying it aloud, but it is a public declaration.

I’m going to post the article in it’s entirety, but I ask you to pay special attention to her reasons why. She has eloquently put into words the exact reasons I allowed this addiction to overtake me. Thankfully, God is a big God, and He’s bigger than any addiction.

Dirty Girls: The New Porn Addicts

The last place you’d expect to see a porno would be the living room of a pastor.But in between my family’s Christmas portrait and a broken, dot matrix printer sat a computer screen. Little did I know the place where I typed up book reports or instant messaged my friends would also become the doorway to an endless amount of forbidden fruit—and an endless amount of guilt.

Growing up the daughter of a Baptist preacher-man, I was the 16-year-old poster child for naiveté. My family had just moved from a small, secluded west Texas town to Dallas, and within a matter of days in my new residence, I was bombarded by the prevalent sexual culture of a big city.

Strip clubs and billboards lined the highways. There was a giant sex store just a few miles from our house. Ignited teenage hormones and the temptation to give in to my curiosity proved to be a dangerous combination.

My parents and brother were fast asleep as I connected to the internet one night. I searched for the word “sex” and within seconds had access to a sea of well endowed platinum blondes doing things with guys (and girls) that I’d never seen before.

Because I lived at home and the only computer was in the living room, there weren’t many opportunities to do my “sexual education research,” but whenever I was alone, I’d quickly satisfy my interest.

I graduated from high school my junior year and moved out when I was only 17 years old. I had my own space with my own computer, and all the free time in the world. I’d go to work (at a local Christian bookstore), come home, and look at porn almost every night.

I frequented erotic chat rooms, watched movies and browsed through hundreds and hundreds of pictures. Soon my porn binges started affecting my performance at work and my relationships.

Of course I never mentioned my struggle to anyone. Looking at porn was typical, even expected, for guys but a girl? A girl who likes porn? I often questioned my sexual orientation.

Why did I like looking at naked women? Was I gay? Bisexual? A pervert? I hated what I was doing so much. I knew it was wrong, but I couldn’t stop.

The cycle continued for years. Binging, feeling guilty and swearing I’d never do it again, only to give in a few days later. I prayed for God to take the desires away. That’s when I realized it was more than just looking at pictures.

I couldn’t stop thinking about it, and I had more than enough pictures saved in my memory to reflect back on, even if I was able to stay off the computer for a while.

So, why do women struggle with this? Although stereotypically we’re not as visually stimulated as our male counterparts, we’re not blind either. There is something about a woman’s body that is beautiful and mysterious and even forbidden, and that toys with our psyche and tempts us.

At least for me, viewing these outwardly flawless women fed a huge emotional need. I was able to put myself in the role of what I was seeing, and by doing that, it made me feel beautiful and accepted.

I was transformed into a perfect, sexy body, and I was desired and wanted. I was able to escape my own flawed physical appearance and be transformed, in my mind, to this perfect woman.

My online activities also played out in my daily life. I was engaged for about a year and cheated on my fiancée. After that, I “dated” several new guys a month, getting physically involved with them in some regard.

According to everything I had seen, to be accepted and loved meant a sexual relationship, and what girl doesn’t need to be accepted and loved? I gave so many pieces of my body and my heart away during those years.

When I was 21, I was in a serious car accident that caused me to reevaluate how I was living my life. At the time, I was pretending like there was no God, except for when I needed His forgiveness, and only then would I come running back to Him. After the wreck, something finally clicked, and I realized that love does not equal sex.

It was at that moment when I decided to turn around—to change my thinking—and then my actions would eventually (and hopefully) follow. I had to say goodbye to my online habits, and to my offline ones as well.

It’s been close to 10 years since my first encounter with online porn, and I’d like to admit I’ve had a perfect run at purity. I wish I could say I’ve always lingered on the right thoughts or shut down the computer when the temptation got to be too much, but the truth is, I haven’t.

I’m still a girl who struggles. I’m still a girl who lives one day at a time, depending on a God whose design for sex and love is so far beyond what I could even imagine. So each and every day, I pray for God to first direct my thinking and then redirect it as necessary.

And I’m grateful that He is faithful to meet me somewhere between the mouse and the computer screen.

Tags: , ,

You Can’t Not Have Doctrine

There’s an interesting post by Brent over at Colossians Three Sixteen called You Can’t Not Have Doctrine (HT: Rhett Smith).He takes Velvet Elvis, by Rob Bell, and Searching for God Knows What, by Donald Miller, and looked at the similarities between the two.

Now, I will be the first to admit that I’m partial to both Bell and Miller, but especially Miller (I’m actually rereading Searching for God Knows What right now). Both of these books have influenced my faith in a lot of ways. They have challenged me to stretch my faith and go beyond blind belief in the man who happens to stand in the pulpit of my church (not that my church has an actual pulpit). They have pushed me to look at how Christ lived and base my life on that and not on the stereotypes of Christianity that have emerged in society.

Brent argues that each of these men “seem to think that they have outgrown doctrine, that talking about springs and relationships somehow means that we no longer need to worry about theological precision.” He says:

But what is so interesting is that both of these books are full of doctrine. You can not not have doctrine, it’s simply impossible because once you do away with doctrine, you’re no longer a Christian. Tell me about this Jesus who saved you…..you cannot do so without doctrine. Bell and Miller simply give recycled voice to the old cliched “Don’t give me doctrine just give me Jesus” routine.

We need to be fair here and admit that Bell and Miller have some valid concerns. Doctrine is often far too rigid and exclusionary, it often formalizes and brings an academic air to truths that were meant to ignite our souls. But at some point we must exclude; some things simply are not Christian and for all the talk of springy relationships, I want to say that at some point, orthodoxy is important.

And I think he has a point. If you’ve read my post called What Do I Do?, then you’ll know that this is something I’m struggling with right now. I grew up fundamentalist; now I attend a seeker-sensitive church that sometimes seems to be afraid to mention the word “sin.” Each are on opposite ends of the spectrum. There has to be middle ground!

Doctrine is important. Without it, any man could make up his own version of Christianity and that would be okay (unfortunately, some people seem to think this is so). But dogmatic doctrine leads to legalism, which is not okay.

That’s what I think both Miller and Bell are fighting in their books. They seem to have found something that the rest of us have forgotten: Christianity is completely relational. Anything else would make it works-based…and many churches will tell you it’s not works-based, but their actions are in direct opposition to that.

So where do we find this middle ground? Is it even possible to find? It seems to me that you have to sacrifice one for the other. Either you get the relational aspect down pat, but there’s no doctrine, or there’s so much doctrine that there’s no room for the relationship.

If I have to choose between the two, I will choose the relationship every time. And I think that’s the direction Bell and Miller are going. They want the middle ground. But the relational aspect of our faith is the most important part; it’s what makes Christianity different from all the other world religions. To diminish that, even for the sake of doctrine, is to diminish who God is.

Tags: , ,

Naming the Animals

One day I’m going to be in heaven and I can ask God all of these questions I have about creation and the Bible. But for now, I’ll just have to try and intelligently make sense of everything. There are two camps of people who believe in Creationism: first, those who believe God created everything in 7 literal 24 hour days and second, those who believe that it could have been any length of time because “a day is as a thousand years and a thousand years is as a day.”

Me? I’m on the fence. I keep going back and forth between the two. The writer of the accounts of Creation we have in Genesis is pretty clear that each day was a period of darkness and a period of daylight. So, 24 hours, right? But then you get to a passage of Scripture like this:

The LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.” Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds of the air and all the beasts of the field. But for Adam no suitable helper was found. (Genesis 2:18-20)

Could Adam really have named all of the animals in the same day? So that makes me lean more towards the other side. I just don’t see how it could have happened in 7 literal days…unless the writer of Genesis got his timetable wrong and the animals were named after everything was done. But I don’t think so.

This is how Donald Miller thinks about it:

I wondered how long it must have taken him to journey to the ocean to name the sea life, and whether he had to make a boat and go out on a boat or whether God had them swim up close to the shore, so Adam only had to in about waist-deep.

I looked up how many animals there are in the world, and it turns out there are between ten million and one hundred million different species. So even if you believe in evolution, that means there were between one million and fifty million species around in the time of the Garden, and Adam, apparently had to name all of them. And the entire time he was lonely.

I never thought of Adam the same again. The image of the man holding the fig leaf over his privates seemed nearly crude. Rather this was a man who, despite feeling a certain need for a companion, performed what must have been nearly one hundred years of work, naming and perhaps even categorizing the animals. It would have taken him nearly a year just to name the species of snakes alone. Moses said Eve didn’t give birth to their third child till Adam was well into his hundreds, which means they would have had Cain and Abel some thirty or so years before, which also means either it took Adam more than a hundred years to name the animals, or he and Eve didn’t have sex for a good, long boring century (emphasis mine).

What a different way to think about this! Miller goes on to talk about how the whole time Adam was naming the animals there wasn’t a companion found for him. He couldn’t communicate with them the way he would with another human. But God didn’t give him a companion until after all of the animals were named.

So here was this guy who was intensely relational, needing other people, and in order to cause him to appreciate the gift of companionship, God had him hang out with chimps for a hundred years. It’s quite beautiful, really. God directed Adam’s steps so that when He created Eve, Adam would have the utmost appreciation, respect, and gratitude.

How cool is that? The more I think about it logically, the more I’m convinced that Miller is right.

Tags: , , , ,

Christian Carnival 128

This week’s Christian Carnival is up at Cadmusings. Highlights from this week:

Jon Swift’s Warren Buffet Turns Against God, a great satirical piece about giving and Christianity.

Heart, Mind, Soul, and Strength’s Pet peeves in the homosexuality debate, which, I think, is pretty self explanatory.

Tags: , ,

Religion–what do you think?

One of the best quotes in Donald Miller’s book, Searching For God Knows What, is:

The very scary thing about religion, to me, is that people actually believe God is who they think He is.

What do you think about that statement? I want to hear from everyone, regardless of or your faith, or lack thereof.

Tags: , , ,

What do I do?

My friends say that I have a Bible in my head. The funny thing is that I don’t know nearly as much Scripture as I used to. The sad thing is that the reason I knew so much was because I was constantly hearing it in church. For me to not know it anymore means I don’t get it in church anymore.

I only recently started carrying my Bible to church again. I don’t need it at church. Often there’s only one or two verses used to make a point, and they are always shown on the screen. But God convicted me of it a few weeks ago, so now I make a point to take my Bible.

I miss real church. Today got close to it. Our church is in the process of hiring a new pastor, and the speaker today was fabulous. This was his second time preaching, and honestly, he’s the best preacher who’s spoken at New Hope Christian Church.

But it still isn’t good enough.

Wow. I feel like a heathen saying that. But God is most definitely stirring within me. I have this hunger for him that isn’t getting fed at New Hope. It never has, but then again, I wasn’t hungry before. My friends go to New Hope, so it’s been good enough for me. But it isn’t anymore.

NHCC only has services on Sunday morning. I really don’t think that’s enough. At the very least it should be Sunday morning and one night a week. In addition to any small groups. A small group shouldn’t take the place of a sermon.

So what do I do? Do I stay at New Hope Sunday mornings and find somewhere else Wednesday night? I don’t like the idea of dividing my time between two churches. I feel strongly that you should have one church home. So does that mean that I need to find a new church altogether? One that I really can call “home”?

I need clarity and wisdom here. I’d appreciate your prayers.

Tags: ,

Perpetually Single

I have rarely used this forum as a means to write about my personal life–mostly because I lead a rather boring life. I wake up, go to work, go home, go to sleep, wake up… it’s a nasty cycle. There’s often deviation from that cycle on the weekends when I go to dinner with friends or to a movie, but for the most part, my life is routine, and no one wants to read about routine. Today is a day I need to get something off of my chest. So you all are the ones I will subject to my “rant.”

I am a 23 year old single female. All of my closest girl friends, save one, is either married or engaged. The one who isn’t is one year older than me. The others, for the most part, are 2-3 years younger. It’s frustrating. For as long as I can remember, the biggest desire of my heart (excepting pleasing God) has been to be a wife and a mother. I’ve most definitely screwed up a lot in the process. I’ve had exactly three boyfriends in my life–all during college–and, unfortunately, not one among them was a Christian.

I’ve grown spiritually so much since then. And God still hasn’t seen fit to bring a husband into my life. And of course, that’s God’s prerogative. I may question God, but I won’t suggest that His plan isn’t the best one for me.

This past week has been full of me torturing myself, and also suffering from the torturing of others! There is a very special man in my life–I’ll call him J. I’ve known J for years–he happens to be one of the boyfriends I mentioned previously. Our friendship is an odd one. We have all the closeness of a great friendship, but not the intimacy (and I’m not talking sexually). We talk every day and he knows more about me than any other person on the planet. I knew that our relationship was quirky–full of flirting and teasing. What I didn’t know was just how deep my feelings for him go. But I found out when he started dating his girlfriend last month. Jealousy can bring a whole lot of things to light.

So what do I do? I tell him about it. Probably not the most brilliant thing I could have done. We have this whole conversation about it in which he reminds me that just last week he told me he could see being married to me. He wasn’t supposed to say that! He and I both know that there’s no possibility of a future together as long as things stay the way they are. I answer to God; he doesn’t. We both know where the other one stands. So, I’ve been torturing myself this week. I have all of these feelings for the guy, and I continue to talk to him all the time.

Then today I’m bombarded by articles written about this very topic! First, there’s Jeremy Pierce’s “Does God have a right person picked out for each person to marry?

The point is this: it can be true to say that God has a person in mind that each person who marries will marry, though that doesn’t mean sinful choices won’t be involved, and it doesn’t mean you made the right choice just because it happened. God can still be behind it in some sense in the same way that he could be behind Judas’ betrayal of Jesus, though it’s not likely the consequences of this kind of thing will be anywhere near as significant (and even that is a massive understatement). But just because it’s true to say this doesn’t mean it’s best to be thinking it all the time. Our responsibility is to live with what God has given us, and for most of you God hasn’t given you this yet if he will. Be faithful with what you have, and God will bless you, perhaps in ways you won’t at all expect and maybe in this area but maybe not.

Then there’s an article in Christianity Today called “30 and Single? It’s your own fault” by Cameron Courtney. Now I have to be fair. The article in question does not believe that singleness is a sin or that it’s your own fault if you are. The article is actually a book review. The book in question is Getting Serious About Getting Married: Rethinking the Gift of Singleness by Debbie Maken. According to the article, Maken makes a good point:

In later chapters, she addresses the well-meaning advice handed to singles in Christian circles—such as “just wait on the Lord to bring a mate to you” or “Jesus is all you need”—and deftly explains some of the erroneous thinking and theology surrounding each. At her best, in passages such as these, Maken gives platitude-battered single women needed permission to admit, “I’d like to get married, and that’s okay.”

However, Maken then takes the stand that nearly every person on the planet is destined to be married. God wants it that way. Cameron takes a stand and makes this incredible statement at the end of the article:

For many of us, singleness is a default reality. Besides praying for revival of the single men of our generation and doing our best to meet the good, godly men who are out there, we’re left trying to make the most of this life stage, trying to find contentment in any and every situation, as Paul encourages (Philippians 4:11-12). In this process of trying to allow God’s redemptive work in this sometimes-unwanted life stage, voices such as Maken’s in Getting Serious About Getting Married sabotage our quest for godly purpose and hope. Most of us still-singles aren’t trying to glorify singleness but to redeem it from second-class citizenship, to remind ourselves and our family-centric churches that God loves, values, and wants to work through all his kids—whether married or single. If we’re going to get serious about some of these difficult singleness realities, and I think we should, why can’t we also get realistic, accurate, and gracious?

And that bring me back to where I started. I don’t want to be single. But God has chosen this path for me right now. But it’s frustrating when everywhere I turn is another reminder that I am still single. It’s frustrating when a man comes into my life who I could see a real future with, only I can’t have one because he doesn’t share my faith. Is this a test? Is God testing me with J to see how I will react? Have I failed again for letting my feelings get the better of me?

Tags: , , ,